@@ -815,8 +816,15 @@ static int __devinit uvesafb_vbe_init(struct fb_info *info)par->pmi_setpal=pmi_setpal;par->ypan=ypan;-if(par->pmi_setpal||par->ypan)-uvesafb_vbe_getpmi(task,par);+if(par->pmi_setpal||par->ypan){+if(pcibios_enabled){+uvesafb_vbe_getpmi(task,par);+}else{+par->pmi_setpal=par->ypan=0;+printk(KERN_WARNING"uvesafb: PCI BIOS area is NX."+"Can't use protected mode interface\n");+}+}#else/* The protected mode interface is not available on non-x86. */par->pmi_setpal=par->ypan=0;
@@ -815,8 +816,15 @@ static int __devinit uvesafb_vbe_init(struct fb_info *info)par->pmi_setpal=pmi_setpal;par->ypan=ypan;-if(par->pmi_setpal||par->ypan)-uvesafb_vbe_getpmi(task,par);+if(par->pmi_setpal||par->ypan){+if(pcibios_enabled){+uvesafb_vbe_getpmi(task,par);+}else{+par->pmi_setpal=par->ypan=0;+printk(KERN_WARNING"uvesafb: PCI BIOS area is NX."+"Can't use protected mode interface\n");+}+}#else/* The protected mode interface is not available on non-x86. */par->pmi_setpal=par->ypan=0;
--
1.7.9.2.315.g25a78
Ok! Can anybody tell me why this patch had been ignored by community?
I try to find out what's wrong with this patch, but I failed to find it out.
So any comment is welcome.Thanks
@@ -815,8 +816,15 @@ static int __devinit uvesafb_vbe_init(struct fb_info *info)par->pmi_setpal=pmi_setpal;par->ypan=ypan;-if(par->pmi_setpal||par->ypan)-uvesafb_vbe_getpmi(task,par);+if(par->pmi_setpal||par->ypan){+if(pcibios_enabled){+uvesafb_vbe_getpmi(task,par);+}else{+par->pmi_setpal=par->ypan=0;+printk(KERN_WARNING"uvesafb: PCI BIOS area is NX."+"Can't use protected mode interface\n");+}+}#else/* The protected mode interface is not available on non-x86. */par->pmi_setpal=par->ypan=0;
--
1.7.9.2.315.g25a78
Ok! Can anybody tell me why this patch had been ignored by community?
I try to find out what's wrong with this patch, but I failed to find it out.
So any comment is welcome.Thanks
Patch looks okay to me. I will wait a few days to give Michal a chance to
comment on it.
Best regards,
Florian Tobias Schandinat
From: Michal Januszewski <hidden> Date: 2012-03-09 00:39:28
Hi,
On Mon, Mar 5, 2012 at 08:09, Florian Tobias Schandinat
[off-list ref] wrote:
On 03/05/2012 12:52 AM, Wang YanQing wrote:
quoted
On Fri, Mar 02, 2012 at 08:48:50AM +0800, Wang YanQing wrote:
quoted
Ok! I think I have learned to make thing simple and send to the right people:)
That's right.
quoted
quoted
This patch try to fix the oops below that catched in my machine
This sounds like you didn't test it. I assume you did? So just write
"This patch fixes the oops below"
quoted
quoted
[  81.560602] uvesafb: NVIDIA Corporation, GT216 Board - 0696a290, Chip Rev  , OEM: NVIDIA, VBE v3.0
[ Â 81.609384] uvesafb: protected mode interface info at c000:d350
[ Â 81.609388] uvesafb: pmi: set display start = c00cd3b3, set palette = c00cd40e
[ Â 81.609390] uvesafb: pmi: ports = 3b4 3b5 3ba 3c0 3c1 3c4 3c5 3c6 3c7 3c8 3c9 3cc 3ce 3cf 3d0 3d1 3d2 3d3 3d4 3d5 3da
[ Â 81.614558] uvesafb: VBIOS/hardware doesn't support DDC transfers
[ Â 81.614562] uvesafb: no monitor limits have been set, default refresh rate will be used
[ Â 81.614994] uvesafb: scrolling: ypan using protected mode interface, yres_virtualI15
[ Â 81.744147] kernel tried to execute NX-protected page - exploit attempt? (uid: 0)
[ Â 81.744153] BUG: unable to handle kernel paging request at c00cd3b3
[ Â 81.744159] IP: [<c00cd3b3>] 0xc00cd3b2
[ Â 81.744167] *pdpt = 00000000016d6001 *pde = 0000000001c7b067 *pte = 80000000000cd163
[ Â 81.744171] Oops: 0011 [#1] SMP
[ Â 81.744174] Modules linked in: uvesafb(+) cfbcopyarea cfbimgblt cfbfillrect
[ Â 81.744178]
[  81.744181] Pid: 3497, comm: modprobe Not tainted 3.3.0-rc4NX+ #71 Acer       Aspire 4741           /Aspire 4741
[ Â 81.744185] EIP: 0060:[<c00cd3b3>] EFLAGS: 00010246 CPU: 0
[ Â 81.744187] EIP is at 0xc00cd3b3
[ Â 81.744189] EAX: 00004f07 EBX: 00000000 ECX: 00000000 EDX: 00000000
[ Â 81.744191] ESI: f763f000 EDI: f763f6e8 EBP: f57f3a0c ESP: f57f3a00
[ Â 81.744192] Â DS: 007b ES: 007b FS: 00d8 GS: 0033 SS: 0068
[ Â 81.744195] Process modprobe (pid: 3497, tiõ7f2000 task÷48c600 task.tiõ7f2000)
[ Â 81.744196] Stack:
[ Â 81.744197] Â f82512c5 f759341c 00000000 f57f3a30 c124a9bc 00000001 00000001 000001e0
[ Â 81.744202] Â f8251280 f763f000 f7593400 00000000 f57f3a40 c12598dd f5c0c000 00000000
[ Â 81.744206] Â f57f3b10 c1255efe c125a21a 00000006 f763f09c 00000000 c1c6cb60 f7593400
[ Â 81.744210] Call Trace:
[ Â 81.744215] Â [<f82512c5>] ? uvesafb_pan_display+0x45/0x60 [uvesafb]
[ Â 81.744222] Â [<c124a9bc>] fb_pan_display+0x10c/0x160
[ Â 81.744226] Â [<f8251280>] ? uvesafb_vbe_find_mode+0x180/0x180 [uvesafb]
[ Â 81.744230] Â [<c12598dd>] bit_update_start+0x1d/0x50
[ Â 81.744232] Â [<c1255efe>] fbcon_switch+0x39e/0x550
[ Â 81.744235] Â [<c125a21a>] ? bit_cursor+0x4ea/0x560
[ Â 81.744240] Â [<c129b6cb>] redraw_screen+0x12b/0x220
[ Â 81.744245] Â [<c128843b>] ? tty_do_resize+0x3b/0xc0
[ Â 81.744247] Â [<c129ef42>] vc_do_resize+0x3d2/0x3e0
[ Â 81.744250] Â [<c129efb4>] vc_resize+0x14/0x20
[ Â 81.744253] Â [<c12586bd>] fbcon_init+0x29d/0x500
[ Â 81.744255] Â [<c12984c4>] ? set_inverse_trans_unicode+0xe4/0x110
[ Â 81.744258] Â [<c129b378>] visual_init+0xb8/0x150
[ Â 81.744261] Â [<c129c16c>] bind_con_driver+0x16c/0x360
[ Â 81.744264] Â [<c129b47e>] ? register_con_driver+0x6e/0x190
[ Â 81.744267] Â [<c129c3a1>] take_over_console+0x41/0x50
[ Â 81.744269] Â [<c1257b7a>] fbcon_takeover+0x6a/0xd0
[ Â 81.744272] Â [<c12594b8>] fbcon_event_notify+0x758/0x790
[ Â 81.744277] Â [<c10929e2>] notifier_call_chain+0x42/0xb0
[ Â 81.744280] Â [<c1092d30>] __blocking_notifier_call_chain+0x60/0x90
[ Â 81.744283] Â [<c1092d7a>] blocking_notifier_call_chain+0x1a/0x20
[ Â 81.744285] Â [<c124a5a1>] fb_notifier_call_chain+0x11/0x20
[ Â 81.744288] Â [<c124b759>] register_framebuffer+0x1d9/0x2b0
[ Â 81.744293] Â [<c1061c73>] ? ioremap_wc+0x33/0x40
[ Â 81.744298] Â [<f82537c6>] uvesafb_probe+0xaba/0xc40 [uvesafb]
[ Â 81.744302] Â [<c12bb81f>] platform_drv_probe+0xf/0x20
[ Â 81.744306] Â [<c12ba558>] driver_probe_device+0x68/0x170
[ Â 81.744309] Â [<c12ba731>] __device_attach+0x41/0x50
[ Â 81.744313] Â [<c12b9088>] bus_for_each_drv+0x48/0x70
[ Â 81.744316] Â [<c12ba7f3>] device_attach+0x83/0xa0
[ Â 81.744319] Â [<c12ba6f0>] ? __driver_attach+0x90/0x90
[ Â 81.744321] Â [<c12b991f>] bus_probe_device+0x6f/0x90
[ Â 81.744324] Â [<c12b8a45>] device_add+0x5e5/0x680
[ Â 81.744329] Â [<c122a1a3>] ? kvasprintf+0x43/0x60
[ Â 81.744332] Â [<c121e6e4>] ? kobject_set_name_vargs+0x64/0x70
[ Â 81.744335] Â [<c121e6e4>] ? kobject_set_name_vargs+0x64/0x70
[ Â 81.744339] Â [<c12bbe9f>] platform_device_add+0xff/0x1b0
[ Â 81.744343] Â [<f8252906>] uvesafb_init+0x50/0x9b [uvesafb]
[ Â 81.744346] Â [<c100111f>] do_one_initcall+0x2f/0x170
[ Â 81.744350] Â [<f82528b6>] ? uvesafb_is_valid_mode+0x66/0x66 [uvesafb]
[ Â 81.744355] Â [<c10c6994>] sys_init_module+0xf4/0x1410
[ Â 81.744359] Â [<c1157fc0>] ? vfsmount_lock_local_unlock_cpu+0x30/0x30
[ Â 81.744363] Â [<c144cb10>] sysenter_do_call+0x12/0x36
[ Â 81.744365] Code: f5 00 00 00 32 f6 66 8b da 66 d1 e3 66 ba d4 03 8a e3 b0 1c 66 ef b0 1e 66 ef 8a e7 b0 1d 66 ef b0 1f 66 ef e8 fa 00 00 00 61 c3 <60> e8 c8 00 00 00 66 8b f3 66 8b da 66 ba d4 03 b0 0c 8a e5 66
[ Â 81.744388] EIP: [<c00cd3b3>] 0xc00cd3b3 SS:ESP 0068:f57f3a00
[ Â 81.744391] CR2: 00000000c00cd3b3
[ Â 81.744393] ---[ end trace 18b2c87c925b54d6 ]---
Signed-off-by: Wang YanQing <udknight@gmail.com>
---
 drivers/video/uvesafb.c |  12 ++++++++++--
 1 file changed, 10 insertions(+), 2 deletions(-)
 #include <video/uvesafb.h>
 #ifdef CONFIG_X86
 #include <video/vga.h>
+#include <linux/pci.h>
 #endif
 #ifdef CONFIG_MTRR
 #include <asm/mtrr.h>
@@ -815,8 +816,15 @@ static int __devinit uvesafb_vbe_init(struct fb_info *info)
   par->pmi_setpal = pmi_setpal;
   par->ypan = ypan;
- Â Â if (par->pmi_setpal || par->ypan)
- Â Â Â Â Â Â uvesafb_vbe_getpmi(task, par);
+ Â Â if (par->pmi_setpal || par->ypan) {
+ Â Â Â Â Â Â if (pcibios_enabled) {
+ Â Â Â Â Â Â Â Â Â Â uvesafb_vbe_getpmi(task, par);
+ Â Â Â Â Â Â } else {
+ Â Â Â Â Â Â Â Â Â Â par->pmi_setpal = par->ypan = 0;
+ Â Â Â Â Â Â Â Â Â Â printk(KERN_WARNING "uvesafb: PCI BIOS area is NX."
+ Â Â Â Â Â Â Â Â Â Â Â Â Â Â "Can't use protected mode interface\n");
+ Â Â Â Â Â Â }
+ Â Â }
 #else
   /* The protected mode interface is not available on non-x86. */
   par->pmi_setpal = par->ypan = 0;
--
1.7.9.2.315.g25a78
Ok! Can anybody tell me why this patch had been ignored by community?
I try to find out what's wrong with this patch, but I failed to find it out.
So any comment is welcome.Thanks
Patch looks okay to me. I will wait a few days to give Michal a chance to
comment on it.
I applied this patch but as there is opposition against exporting
'pcibios_enabled' and otherwise the building uvesafb as a module would
be broken I reverted it for this merge window, sorry. If you get this
solved I'd like to push it in some -rc (as well as in stable).
Best regards,
Florian Tobias Schandinat
@@ -815,8 +816,15 @@ static int __devinit uvesafb_vbe_init(struct fb_info *info)par->pmi_setpal=pmi_setpal;par->ypan=ypan;-if(par->pmi_setpal||par->ypan)-uvesafb_vbe_getpmi(task,par);+if(par->pmi_setpal||par->ypan){+if(pcibios_enabled){+uvesafb_vbe_getpmi(task,par);+}else{+par->pmi_setpal=par->ypan=0;+printk(KERN_WARNING"uvesafb: PCI BIOS area is NX."+"Can't use protected mode interface\n");+}+}#else/* The protected mode interface is not available on non-x86. */par->pmi_setpal=par->ypan=0;