Re: [PATCH] [#7001] framebuffer: old image of last app would retain for a while after starting new app

2 messages, 2 authors, 2012-03-16 · open the first message on its own page

Re: [PATCH] [#7001] framebuffer: old image of last app would retain for a while after starting new app

From: Zhang, Sonic <hidden>
Date: 2012-03-16 03:34:08


-----Original Message-----
From: Mike Frysinger [mailto:vapier-aBrp7R+bbdUdnm+yROfE0A@public.gmane.org]
Sent: Friday, March 16, 2012 3:08 AM
To: uclinux-dist-devel-ZG0+EudsQA8dtHy/vicBwGD2FQJk+8+b@public.gmane.org
Cc: Wu, Aaron; linux-fbdev-devel-5NWGOfrQmneRv+LV9MX5uipxlwaOVQ5f@public.gmane.org; Zhang, Sonic
Subject: Re: [uclinux-dist-devel] [PATCH] [#7001] framebuffer: old image of last app would retain for a while after starting new app

On Thursday 15 March 2012 05:23:50 Wu, Aaron wrote:
Old image of last application would retain for a while when starting a
new application, this patch clear the frambuffer before displaying
every time the fb is opened.
i'm not sure the behavior you describe is wrong.  in fact, i'm pretty sure it sounds correct.  if an app writes an image to the framebuffer and then quits, that image should stay there indefinitely until something else opens the framebuffer and draws their own image.
-mike

Before the second application draws its own image, the image of last application has already been displayed on the LCD when the second application opens the FB device(PPI is enabled when it is opened). This is not a correct behavior.

Sonic

Re: [PATCH] [#7001] framebuffer: old image of last app would retain for a while after starting new app

From: Mike Frysinger <hidden>
Date: 2012-03-16 03:54:36

On Thursday 15 March 2012 23:34:08 Zhang, Sonic wrote:
From: Mike Frysinger [mailto:vapier@gentoo.org]
quoted
On Thursday 15 March 2012 05:23:50 Wu, Aaron wrote:
quoted
Old image of last application would retain for a while when starting a
new application, this patch clear the frambuffer before displaying
every time the fb is opened.
i'm not sure the behavior you describe is wrong.  in fact, i'm pretty sure
it sounds correct.  if an app writes an image to the framebuffer and then
quits, that image should stay there indefinitely until something else
opens the framebuffer and draws their own image.
Before the second application draws its own image, the image of last
application has already been displayed on the LCD when the second
application opens the FB device(PPI is enabled when it is opened). This is
not a correct behavior.
sure it is.  if the app wants to clear the screen, it can do so.  generally 
it's going to anyways by drawing an entire frame.  having the frame buffer 
driver always clear the screen introduces wasted memory overhead as it does 
the memset(), and user-visible jank as the device transitions from an initial 
splash screen to the main userspace app.

this is a policy decision that doesn't really belong in kernel space.  and if 
it did, it should be agreed upon by all frame buffer users and not just 
changing a few drivers.
-mike
Keyboard shortcuts
hback out one level
jnext message in thread
kprevious message in thread
ldrill in
Escclose help / fold thread tree
?toggle this help