Thread (7 messages) 7 messages, 2 authors, 2012-01-30

Re: udlfb: remove sysfs framebuffer device with USB .disconnect()

flat view

From: Kay Sievers <hidden>
Date: 2012-01-27 16:32:23

On Sat, Jan 21, 2012 at 15:32, Kay Sievers [off-list ref] wrote:
On Sat, 2012-01-21 at 14:13 +0000, Florian Tobias Schandinat wrote:
quoted
On 01/21/2012 01:57 PM, Kay Sievers wrote:
quoted
quoted
That's true. If one calls the current _unregister() *before* calling
_unlink(), the _unlink() is a NOP. But that's intentional.
I don't think you got me right. My complaint was that after your patch
do_unregister_framebuffer itself calls unlink_framebuffer _after_ it set
registered_fb[i] = NULL;
So for any framebuffer that does not call unlink_framebuffer directly the line
device_destroy(fb_class, MKDEV(FB_MAJOR, i));
will no longer be executed. Do you agree?
Yes, I absolutely agree. :)
Hey Florian,

any updates?

We like to get that into the Fedora kernel, as we promised
out-of-the-box multi-seat hotplug support, but the framebuffer events
are broken at the moment.

It would be nice if it would show up in -next somehow, and gets
testing, so I don't need to convince anybody at the Fedora kernel
side, that this will land upstream ...

Thanks,
Kay
Keyboard shortcuts
hback out one level
jnext message in thread
kprevious message in thread
ldrill in
Escclose help / fold thread tree
?toggle this help