On Tue, 13 Dec 2011, Laurent Pinchart wrote:
quoted hunk ↗ jump to hunk
Pass a pointer to the transmitter device through platform data, retrieve
the corresponding sh_mobile_lcdc_entity structure in the probe method
and call the transmitter display_on/off methods directly.
Signed-off-by: Laurent Pinchart <laurent.pinchart@ideasonboard.com>
---
drivers/video/sh_mobile_lcdcfb.c | 33 ++++++++++++++++++++++++++++-----
drivers/video/sh_mobile_lcdcfb.h | 2 ++
include/video/sh_mobile_lcdc.h | 2 ++
3 files changed, 32 insertions(+), 5 deletions(-)
diff --git a/drivers/video/sh_mobile_lcdcfb.c b/drivers/video/sh_mobile_lcdcfb.c
index afa1fac..f1bbae6 100644
--- a/drivers/video/sh_mobile_lcdcfb.c
+++ b/drivers/video/sh_mobile_lcdcfb.c
@@ -338,6 +338,13 @@ static void sh_mobile_lcdc_deferred_io_touch(struct fb_info *info)
static void sh_mobile_lcdc_display_on(struct sh_mobile_lcdc_chan *ch)
{
struct sh_mobile_lcdc_board_cfg *board_cfg = &ch->cfg.board_cfg;
+ int ret;
+
+ if (ch->tx_dev) {
+ ret = ch->tx_dev->ops->display_on(ch->tx_dev, ch->info);
->ops or ->display_o{n,ff}() cannot be NULL?
also
+ int ret = ch->tx_dev->ops->display_on(ch->tx_dev, ch->info);
would suffice;-)
quoted hunk ↗ jump to hunk
+ if (ret < 0)
+ return;
+ }
/* HDMI must be enabled before LCDC configuration */
if (board_cfg->display_on && try_module_get(board_cfg->owner)) {@@ -354,6 +361,9 @@ static void sh_mobile_lcdc_display_off(struct sh_mobile_lcdc_chan *ch)
board_cfg->display_off(board_cfg->board_data);
module_put(board_cfg->owner);
}
+
+ if (ch->tx_dev)
+ ch->tx_dev->ops->display_off(ch->tx_dev);
}
/* -----------------------------------------------------------------------------
@@ -1490,18 +1500,21 @@ static int sh_mobile_lcdc_remove(struct platform_device *pdev)
sh_mobile_lcdc_stop(priv);
for (i = 0; i < ARRAY_SIZE(priv->ch); i++) {
- info = priv->ch[i].info;
+ struct sh_mobile_lcdc_chan *ch = &priv->ch[i];
+ info = ch->info;
if (!info || !info->device)
continue;
- if (priv->ch[i].sglist)
- vfree(priv->ch[i].sglist);
+ if (ch->tx_dev)
+ module_put(ch->cfg.tx_dev->dev.driver->owner);
This is now the same ->owner, as the one taken in your
sh_mobile_lcdc_display_o{n,ff}() functions? IIUC, you're now adding this
new ->owner field to later (17/57) remove the original one?
quoted hunk ↗ jump to hunk
+
+ if (ch->sglist)
+ vfree(ch->sglist);
if (info->screen_base)
dma_free_coherent(&pdev->dev, info->fix.smem_len,
- info->screen_base,
- priv->ch[i].dma_handle);
+ info->screen_base, ch->dma_handle);
fb_dealloc_cmap(&info->cmap);
framebuffer_release(info);
}
@@ -1596,6 +1609,16 @@ sh_mobile_lcdc_channel_init(struct sh_mobile_lcdc_priv *priv,
info->pseudo_palette = &ch->pseudo_palette;
info->flags = FBINFO_FLAG_DEFAULT;
+ if (cfg->tx_dev) {
+ if (!cfg->tx_dev->dev.driver ||
+ !try_module_get(cfg->tx_dev->dev.driver->owner)) {
+ dev_warn(priv->dev, "unable to get transmitter "
+ "device\n");
Grrr... Pleeeease, don't split strings. If you really have to program on
vt220;-) at least do
+ dev_warn(priv->dev,
+ "unable to get transmitter device\n");
quoted hunk ↗ jump to hunk
+ return -EINVAL;
+ }
+ ch->tx_dev = platform_get_drvdata(cfg->tx_dev);
+ }
+
/* Iterate through the modes to validate them and find the highest
* resolution.
*/
diff --git a/drivers/video/sh_mobile_lcdcfb.h b/drivers/video/sh_mobile_lcdcfb.h
index d79e5aa..9601b92 100644
--- a/drivers/video/sh_mobile_lcdcfb.h
+++ b/drivers/video/sh_mobile_lcdcfb.h
@@ -41,6 +41,8 @@ struct sh_mobile_lcdc_entity {
*/
struct sh_mobile_lcdc_chan {
struct sh_mobile_lcdc_priv *lcdc;
+ struct sh_mobile_lcdc_entity *tx_dev;
+
unsigned long *reg_offs;
unsigned long ldmt1r_value;
unsigned long enabled; /* ME and SE in LDCNT2R */diff --git a/include/video/sh_mobile_lcdc.h b/include/video/sh_mobile_lcdc.h
index fe30b75..0ec59e1 100644
--- a/include/video/sh_mobile_lcdc.h
+++ b/include/video/sh_mobile_lcdc.h
@@ -186,6 +186,8 @@ struct sh_mobile_lcdc_chan_cfg {
struct sh_mobile_lcdc_bl_info bl_info;
struct sh_mobile_lcdc_sys_bus_cfg sys_bus_cfg; /* only for SYSn I/F */
struct sh_mobile_meram_cfg *meram_cfg;
+
+ struct platform_device *tx_dev; /* HDMI/MIPI transmitter device */
"MIPI" is too generic, IMHO
Hm, could we, maybe, have different names for sh_mobile_lcdc_chan::tx_dev
and sh_mobile_lcdc_chan_cfg::tx_dev?;-)
};
struct sh_mobile_lcdc_info {
--
1.7.3.4
Thanks
Guennadi
---
Guennadi Liakhovetski, Ph.D.
Freelance Open-Source Software Developer
http://www.open-technology.de/