Re: [Bugme-new] [Bug 40492] New: FB_BACKLIGHT should be set by
From: Michel Dänzer <hidden>
Date: 2011-08-04 05:55:16
On Mit, 2011-08-03 at 17:55 -0700, Randy Dunlap wrote:
On Wed, 3 Aug 2011 18:55:41 GMT bugzilla-daemon@bugzilla.kernel.org wrote:quoted
https://bugzilla.kernel.org/show_bug.cgi?id@492 Summary: FB_BACKLIGHT should be set by BACKLIGHT_CLASS_DEVICE Product: Other Version: 2.5 Kernel Version: 3.0.0 Platform: All OS/Version: Linux Tree: Mainline Status: NEW Severity: normal Priority: P1 Component: Configuration AssignedTo: other_configuration@kernel-bugs.osdl.org ReportedBy: StormByte@gmail.com Regression: No Created an attachment (idg432) --> (https://bugzilla.kernel.org/attachment.cgi?idg432) Kernel's config I discovered a scenario in which menuconfig fails to set FB_BACKLIGHT symbol when needed. In my case, I have propietary nvidia drivers once loaded Xorg, but in the meanwhile, I have configured an uvesafb framebuffer (thus, no other framebuffer active nor compiled). System works ok, but when trying to install nvidiabl[1] (to control nvidia's backlight) I find that FB_BACKLIGHT is not set where it should be because I have BACKLIGHT_CLASS_DEVICE set. The result is that nvidiabl does not compile.
Sounds like an nvidiabl bug. I'm successfully using backlight control with radeon KMS with # CONFIG_FB_BACKLIGHT is not set CONFIG_BACKLIGHT_CLASS_DEVICE=m -- Earthling Michel Dänzer | http://www.amd.com Libre software enthusiast | Debian, X and DRI developer