[PATCH] udlfb - Fix for problem with monitor resolution detection /

STALE5521d

2 messages, 2 authors, 2011-06-22 · open the first message on its own page

[PATCH] udlfb - Fix for problem with monitor resolution detection /

From: <hidden>
Date: 2011-06-22 17:15:38

Hello,

This is my first contribution on this list, so please let me know if I am off with any procedures or anything.

This patch fixes a problem where a DisplayLink device autoselects a suboptimal framebuffer resolution. The problem occured with a Plugable UGA-2K-A connected to a Samsung EX2220X display. In this situation, the driver always allocates a 1600x1200 framebuffer, even after it indicates in its output that 1920x1080 is a valid mode. If my interpretation of the code is correct, the problem was in the block that selects the best mode. The existing code unset the FB_MISC_1ST_DETAIL flag if ANY of the modes is determined to be invalid (on my adapter, 1680x1680 is invalid). This in turn causes the fb_find_best_display() function to disregard the first mode (1920x1080). The comment for the line that unsets the flag implies that this should happen if we have removed the top/best mode...however, this else block is not qualified, and happens if we remove any mode. I simply put in a condition so that we only unset this flag if the first mode is invalid.

Thanks in advance for your feedback.

Bill Katsak
Bell Laboratories
Alcatel-Lucent, Inc.
william.katsak@alcatel-lucent.com

Re: [PATCH] udlfb - Fix for problem with monitor resolution detection

From: Florian Tobias Schandinat <FlorianSchandinat@gmx.de>
Date: 2011-06-22 20:33:22

Hi,

On 06/22/2011 05:15 PM, Katsak, William Alexander (Bill) wrote:
This is my first contribution on this list, so please let me know if I am off with any procedures or anything.
Please send patches inline to make review easier, preferably using "git 
send-email" to avoid broken patches.
 From c3327c41877637e80f9f06a8ce3bdcfe8b4e6fa4 Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001
From: William Katsak<redacted>
Date: Wed, 22 Jun 2011 12:48:11 -0400
Subject: [PATCH] This patch fixes a problem where a DisplayLink device autoselects a
   suboptimal framebuffer resolution.

The situation in which the problem occurred was with a Plugable UGA-2K-A
connected to a Samsung EX2220X display. The driver indicates that
1920x1080 is a valid mode (the first mode available, in fact), but
proceeds to set the framebuffer size to 1600x1200.

The patch corrects what seems to be a logic error, regarding unsetting
the FB_MISC_1ST_DETAIL flag, if the first (top/best) mode is invalid.
The existing code unset the flag if ANY mode was invalid.
You're missing a Signed-off-line, see Documentation/SubmittingPatches in your 
kernel sources.


Best regards,

Florian Tobias Schandinat
quoted hunk
---
  drivers/video/udlfb.c |    8 ++++++--
  1 files changed, 6 insertions(+), 2 deletions(-)
diff --git a/drivers/video/udlfb.c b/drivers/video/udlfb.c
index 52b0f3e..816a4fd 100644
--- a/drivers/video/udlfb.c
+++ b/drivers/video/udlfb.c
@@ -1233,8 +1233,12 @@ static int dlfb_setup_modes(struct dlfb_data *dev,
  			if (dlfb_is_valid_mode(&info->monspecs.modedb[i], info))
  				fb_add_videomode(&info->monspecs.modedb[i],
  					&info->modelist);
-			else /* if we've removed top/best mode */
-				info->monspecs.misc&= ~FB_MISC_1ST_DETAIL;
+			else {
+				if (i = 0)
+					/* if we've removed top/best mode */
+					info->monspecs.misc
+						&= ~FB_MISC_1ST_DETAIL;
+			}
  		}

  		default_vmode = fb_find_best_display(&info->monspecs,

Keyboard shortcuts
hback out one level
jnext message in thread
kprevious message in thread
ldrill in
Escclose help / fold thread tree
?toggle this help