Re: [PATCH v2] matroxfb: remove incorrect Matrox G200eV support
From: Gary Hade <hidden>
Date: 2011-03-11 22:23:46
Also in:
lkml
On Mon, Mar 07, 2011 at 07:59:16PM +1100, Benjamin Herrenschmidt wrote:
On Fri, 2011-03-04 at 12:29 -0800, Darrick J. Wong wrote:quoted
This is all quite strange -- 2.5 years ago when I wrote the patch it seemed to work ok. On newer revisions of the x3650M2 it seems broken. The original machine I wrote it for was cut up ages ago. I suppose we could simply blacklist any G200eV with a subsystem vendor ID of 0x1014 (IBM) until we figure out how to correct the driver. Our customers will be deprived, but as it seems to be broken across most of our product lines I doubt any of them are making serious use of it anyway. :) Something like this?Does X work with the open source drivers ?
Yes, X works fine on at least the IBM System x boxes that have the Matrox G200eV.
In that case a better approach would be to try to figure out what's different between the way the 2 drivers setup the card registers and fix matroxfb..
I suppose someone could attempt this but with vesafb available as an alternate fb provider and no known demand for repaired G200eV support in matroxfb, I am not sure what benefit it would provide. Gary