[PATCH] video: imx: Update the manufacturer name

Signed-off-by: Fabio Estevam <redacted>
---
 drivers/video/Kconfig |    2 +-
 1 files changed, 1 insertions(+), 1 deletions(-)

diff --git a/drivers/video/Kconfig b/drivers/video/Kconfig
index 55dc6fb..0ac30ef 100644
--- a/drivers/video/Kconfig
+++ b/drivers/video/Kconfig

@@ -414,7 +414,7 @@ config FB_SA1100
 	  Y here.
 
 config FB_IMX
-	tristate "Motorola i.MX LCD support"
+	tristate "Freescale i.MX LCD support"
 	depends on FB && (HAVE_FB_IMX || ARCH_MX1 || ARCH_MX2)
 	select FB_CFB_FILLRECT
 	select FB_CFB_COPYAREA

-- 
1.6.0.4

Hello Fabio,

On Sun, Jan 09, 2011 at 02:33:38PM -0200, Fabio Estevam wrote:

do you have an explanation why this is wrong?  Was it a copy&paste
error?  If it used to be correct I'd prefer to keep Motorola in there.

Best regards
Uwe

-- 
Pengutronix e.K.                           | Uwe Kleine-König            |
Industrial Linux Solutions                 | http://www.pengutronix.de/  |

Hi Uwe,

2011/1/9 Uwe Kleine-König [off-list ref]:

Hello Fabio,

On Sun, Jan 09, 2011 at 02:33:38PM -0200, Fabio Estevam wrote:

quoted

Signed-off-by: Fabio Estevam <redacted>
---
 drivers/video/Kconfig |    2 +-
 1 files changed, 1 insertions(+), 1 deletions(-)

diff --git a/drivers/video/Kconfig b/drivers/video/Kconfig
index 55dc6fb..0ac30ef 100644
--- a/drivers/video/Kconfig
+++ b/drivers/video/Kconfig

@@ -414,7 +414,7 @@ config FB_SA1100

        Y here.

 config FB_IMX
-     tristate "Motorola i.MX LCD support"
+     tristate "Freescale i.MX LCD support"

do you have an explanation why this is wrong?  Was it a copy&paste
error?  If it used to be correct I'd prefer to keep Motorola in there.

The reason is that there exists no "Motorola i.MX" anymore.

Freescale is the company that manufactures the i.MX processors
currently, not Motorola.

Motorola used to manufacture i.MX devices until 2004. After the
spin-off in 2004, Freescale continued as the i.MX manufacturer.

Also, if you look at the first submission of the i.MX framebuffer
driver from Sascha (imxfb: Add Freescale i.MX framebuffer driver -
http://git.kernel.org/?p=linux/kernel/git/torvalds/linux-2.6.git;a=commit;h|2f891cb64b0b9c8d389da97c221ee4288f1307)
it contains the correct name there ,so this patch makes the driver
selection consistent.

Regards,

Fabio Estevam

Hello Fabio,

On Sun, Jan 09, 2011 at 09:19:18PM -0200, Fabio Estevam wrote:

2011/1/9 Uwe Kleine-König [off-list ref]:

quoted

On Sun, Jan 09, 2011 at 02:33:38PM -0200, Fabio Estevam wrote:

quoted

Signed-off-by: Fabio Estevam <redacted>
---
 drivers/video/Kconfig |    2 +-
 1 files changed, 1 insertions(+), 1 deletions(-)

diff --git a/drivers/video/Kconfig b/drivers/video/Kconfig
index 55dc6fb..0ac30ef 100644
--- a/drivers/video/Kconfig
+++ b/drivers/video/Kconfig

@@ -414,7 +414,7 @@ config FB_SA1100

        Y here.

 config FB_IMX
-     tristate "Motorola i.MX LCD support"
+     tristate "Freescale i.MX LCD support"

do you have an explanation why this is wrong?  Was it a copy&paste
error?  If it used to be correct I'd prefer to keep Motorola in there.

The reason is that there exists no "Motorola i.MX" anymore.

Freescale is the company that manufactures the i.MX processors
currently, not Motorola.

Motorola used to manufacture i.MX devices until 2004. After the
spin-off in 2004, Freescale continued as the i.MX manufacturer.

Also, if you look at the first submission of the i.MX framebuffer
driver from Sascha (imxfb: Add Freescale i.MX framebuffer driver -
http://git.kernel.org/?p=linux/kernel/git/torvalds/linux-2.6.git;a=commit;h|2f891cb64b0b9c8d389da97c221ee4288f1307)
it contains the correct name there ,so this patch makes the driver
selection consistent.

If you add (a maybe shortend version of) this to the commit log it would
be fine for me.

Uwe

-- 
Pengutronix e.K.                           | Uwe Kleine-König            |
Industrial Linux Solutions                 | http://www.pengutronix.de/  |