RE: OMAP DSS2 coming out of OFF mode without restoring context
From: Aguirre, Sergio <hidden>
Date: 2010-07-30 15:15:23
Also in:
linux-omap
Hi,
-----Original Message----- From: linux-omap-owner@vger.kernel.org [mailto:linux-omap- owner@vger.kernel.org] On Behalf Of Menon, Nishanth Sent: Friday, July 30, 2010 8:01 AM To: Tomi Valkeinen Cc: ext Laine Walker-Avina; linux-omap@vger.kernel.org; linux- fbdev@vger.kernel.org Subject: Re: OMAP DSS2 coming out of OFF mode without restoring context Tomi Valkeinen had written, on 07/30/2010 06:17 AM, the following:quoted
On Fri, 2010-07-30 at 13:09 +0200, ext Menon, Nishanth wrote:quoted
----- Original message -----quoted
Hi, On Thu, 2010-07-29 at 23:29 +0200, ext Laine Walker-Avina wrote:quoted
Hi, I'm having a problem where the DSS driver isn't restoring the framebuffer parameters after going in and out of blanking with OFF mode enabled. The problem appears to be in dss_get_ctx_id() in that pdata->get_last_off_on_transaction_id is 0. Commenting out the calltoquoted
quoted
quoted
quoted
dss_need_ctx_restore() in dss_clk_enable() appears to do the right thing. I'm using the current master branch of linux-omap.You need to fill the func pointer in the board file: static struct omap_dss_board_info xxx_dss_data = { .get_last_off_on_transaction_id > >>> omap_pm_get_dev_context_loss_count,none of l-o board files seem to do this. I guess with off capable master, we need this to be defaulted under CONFIG_PM within dss/core itself? I mean the defaults prevent display function at off, so why ask all boards to fill it up?If the PM stuff in linux tree starts to be in working order, then yes, we need some better solution. I'm not quite sure what the options are, but I was told that the correct way to get context loss count is as above, fill the platform_data in the board file with a pointer to omap_pm_get_dev_context_loss_count(). So if that is still the proper way, then we need a "DSS platform initialization" function that the board files can call, which then fills the platform_data with correct data. But this will still require modifying every board file that uses DSS. Then again, every board file needs anyway DSS code, so perhaps that's not such a big issue. For this particular case there's not much benefit having a separate initialization function. On the contrary, it'll just have more code lines. But I think there will be some more platform DSS stuff (like pinmuxing) which can then use the same mechanism. TomiI was thinking more of the lines of this: a) omap_pm_get_dev_context_loss_count is exported OR b) there is a file arch/arm/mach-omap2/dss.c which would take this..
I'm curious about something... Why this can't be part of the platform code per-cpu? It makes no sense to me (unless I'm missing something here) to put this In mach-omap2/ files... It should be on plat-omap/ somewhere. What do you think? Regards, Sergio
quoted hunk ↗ jump to hunk
diff --git a/drivers/video/omap2/dss/core.cb/drivers/video/omap2/dss/core.c index b3a498f..0b9041a 100644--- a/drivers/video/omap2/dss/core.c +++ b/drivers/video/omap2/dss/core.c@@ -35,6 +35,7 @@ #include <plat/display.h> #include <plat/clock.h> +#include <plat/omap-pm.h> #include "dss.h"@@ -502,6 +503,10 @@ static int omap_dss_probe(struct platform_device*pdev) core.pdev = pdev; + if (!core.pdev->get_last_off_on_transaction_id) + core.pdev->get_last_off_on_transaction_id > + omap_pm_get_dev_context_loss_count; + dss_init_overlay_managers(pdev); dss_init_overlays(pdev); -- Regards, Nishanth Menon -- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-omap" in the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html