Re: [PATCH 10/11] viafb: rework the I2C support in the VIA framebuffer
From: Florian Tobias Schandinat <FlorianSchandinat@gmx.de>
Date: 2010-04-24 10:47:43
Also in:
lkml
From: Florian Tobias Schandinat <FlorianSchandinat@gmx.de>
Date: 2010-04-24 10:47:43
Also in:
lkml
Florian Tobias Schandinat schrieb:
Jonathan Corbet schrieb:quoted
On Sat, 24 Apr 2010 00:40:39 +0200 Florian Tobias Schandinat [off-list ref] wrote: Meanwhile, I'm a little unsure now...is there an action item for me with regard to the i2c code? I've been staring at it since your last note, but I couldn't find any obvious problems. I do have to say that Harald's rework is far cleaner than what came before...Well the main question is probably: How does it change the behaviour towards the hardware? I tend to think that OLPC might not be the only ones who did something weird with it....and we already know that we shouldn't trust the documentation too much.
I was able to narrow this issue down to the fourth bus. So with if (i = 4) continue; in the bus creation loop I'm able to get a working framebuffer which does not have the issues mentioned. Any ideas what should be done now? Thanks, Florian Tobias Schandinat