RE: [PATCH] Fix crash in viafb due to 4k stack overflow
From: <hidden>
Date: 2008-11-14 10:20:44
Also in:
lkml
8K stacks, I don't enable the CONFIG_4KSTACKS. In addition, I also tried to enable CONFIG_4KSTACKS, the system still returns me lots "panic" during system bootup. :( BRs, Joseph Chan -----Original Message----- From: Bruno Prémont [mailto:bonbons@linux-vserver.org] Sent: Friday, November 14, 2008 5:02 PM To: Joseph Chan Cc: akpm@linux-foundation.org; arjan@infradead.org; linux-fbdev-devel@lists.sourceforge.net; linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org; Scott Fang Subject: Re: [PATCH] Fix crash in viafb due to 4k stack overflow Joseph, Are you testing with 4k stacks or with 8k stacks (CONFIG_4KSTACKS)? Note that your failure looks pretty much like the ones I mentionned in http://lkml.org/lkml/2008/11/9/204 It looks like some kernel text/data got corrupted though I have no idea what caused it. For me this kind of NULL pointer dereference did happen a few times then stopped showing up (just a reboot, not kernel change/recompile) Bruno On Fri, 14 Nov 2008 [off-list ref] wrote:
After testing the patch with 2.6.28-rc4 kernel, I found something strange in both viafb built-in and module modes. See the result on my EPIA-EX (CX700) below. Based on the result, it looks like something wrong with the new patch. Kernel 2.6.28-rc4 + viafb-fix-crash-due-to-4k-stack-overflow.patch 1. w/o patching the viafb-fix-crash-due-to-4k-stack-overflow.patch => System works properly without "kernel panic" issue. 2. w/ patching the viafb-fix-crash-due-to-4k-stack-overflow.patch => System hangs with "kernel panic" randomly after loading the viafb module. Such as: BUG: unable to handle kernel NULL pointer dereference at 000000c7 IP: [<c03dc6ec>] rt_worker_func+0xc7/0x15d Last sysfs file: /sys/class/graphics/fb0/dev Modules linked in: viafb i2c_algo_bit via_rhine sg pata_via sd_mod ehci_hcd Pid: 6, comm: events/0 Not tainted (2.6.28-rc4b #1) pn test EIP: 0060:[<c03dc6ec>] EFLAGS: 00010286 CPU:0 EIP is at rt_worker_func+0xc7/0x15d ...... .... ..... BRs, Joseph -----Original Message----- From: Joseph Chan Sent: Thursday, November 13, 2008 8:58 AM To: 'Andrew Morton'; Bruno Prémont Cc: arjan@infradead.org; linux-fbdev-devel@lists.sourceforge.net; linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org Subject: RE: [PATCH] Fix crash in viafb due to 4k stack overflow I will try this new patch later. :) BRs, Joseph Chan -----Original Message----- From: Andrew Morton [mailto:akpm@linux-foundation.org] Sent: Thursday, November 13, 2008 7:01 AM To: Bruno Prémont Cc: arjan@infradead.org; Joseph Chan; linux-fbdev-devel@lists.sourceforge.net; linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org Subject: Re: [PATCH] Fix crash in viafb due to 4k stack overflow On Mon, 10 Nov 2008 22:00:46 +0100 Bruno Pr__mont [off-list ref] wrote:quoted
During conversion of viafb_ioctl() I noticed the following: Those two cases just copy_from_user and do nothing with copied data, incomplete implementation?: case VIAFB_SET_PANEL_POSITION: if (copy_from_user(&u.panel_pos_size_para, argp, sizeof(u.panel_pos_size_para))) return -EFAULT; break; case VIAFB_SET_PANEL_SIZE: if (copy_from_user(&u.panel_pos_size_para, argp, sizeof(u.panel_pos_size_para))) return -EFAULT; break; Handling of GET/SET GAMMA looks buggy: In each case 256*4 bytes are allocated but only 4 bytes (size of pointer) are copied to/from userspace though viafb_(get|set)_gamma_table() operates on the full 256 elements... case VIAFB_SET_GAMMA_LUT: viafb_gamma_table = kmalloc(256 * sizeof(u32), GFP_KERNEL); if (!viafb_gamma_table) return -ENOMEM; if (copy_from_user(viafb_gamma_table, argp, sizeof(viafb_gamma_table))) { kfree(viafb_gamma_table); return -EFAULT; } viafb_set_gamma_table(viafb_bpp, viafb_gamma_table); kfree(viafb_gamma_table); break; case VIAFB_GET_GAMMA_LUT: viafb_gamma_table = kmalloc(256 * sizeof(u32), GFP_KERNEL); if (!viafb_gamma_table) return -ENOMEM; viafb_get_gamma_table(viafb_gamma_table); if (copy_to_user(argp, viafb_gamma_table, sizeof(viafb_gamma_table))) { kfree(viafb_gamma_table); return -EFAULT; } kfree(viafb_gamma_table); break; I don't know if there is a userspace app that uses these VIA IOCTLs... so the ioctl part is just compile-tested. After checking, fbset just uses some generic framebuffer IOCTLs outside of viafb's scope, thus not passing through viafb_ioctl(). ------ linux-2.6.28-rc3/drivers/video/via/viafbdev.c.orig2008-11-09 19:36:47.000000000 +0100 +++ linux-2.6.28-rc3/drivers/video/via/viafbdev.c 2008-11-10 20:50:32.000000000 +0100hm, OK, I dropped the old patch and merged this one. It'd be nice to have it runtime tested and reviewed by Joseph, but we haven't heard from him yet. viafb might be 8k-stacks-only in 2.6.27, which would be bad.