On Tue, 13 May 2008 09:35:54 -0700
Andrew Morton [off-list ref] wrote:

On Tue, 13 May 2008 08:48:02 -0700 (PDT) Linus Torvalds
[off-list ref] wrote:

quoted

On Mon, 12 May 2008, Andres Salomon wrote:

quoted

Sorry for the delay, I got around to testing this today.  It works
much better on an XO, so I've ack'd it.

If people expect me to apply that patch, I hope they'll re-send
(with acks etc). Otherwise I just expect I'll get it through the
normal fbdev queues (which is often Andrew, but shouldn't be).

It got confusing.  Turns out that I had a speculative revert patch,
followed by a new patch with an identical changelog to the first one.

I folded them together and below is what I presently have against
mainline, but I have no changelog describing what it fixes.

Can someone send some text please?

How's this?  Jordan and Jens, please correct me if I'm off.




[PATCH] lxfb: fix regression on OLPC caused by PLL table updates

The following patch caused a regression with OLPC panels:

 commit 3888d4639e78802c4ec1086127124e890461b9e4
    lxfb: extend PLL table to support dotclocks below 25 MHz

    Extends the PLL frequency table of the AMD Geode-LX frame buffer driver to
    make use of the DIV4 bit, thus adding support for dotclocks between 6 and 25
    MHz.  These are needed for small LCDs (e.g.  320x240).  Also inserts some
    intermediate steps between pre-existing frequencies.

The problem was the insertion of intermediate steps into the frequency
table; they would cause the wrong frequency to be matched.  This patch
drops those intermediate frequencies while keeping the sub-25MHz
frequencies.

Signed-off-by: Andres Salomon <redacted>

-------------------------------------------------------------------------
This SF.net email is sponsored by: Microsoft 
Defy all challenges. Microsoft(R) Visual Studio 2008. 
http://clk.atdmt.com/MRT/go/vse0120000070mrt/direct/01/