Re: [PATCH 01/10] fbdev: Clean up of sparc FB options
From: "Antonino A. Daplas" <adaplas@gmail.com>
Date: 2007-05-16 23:15:17
On Wed, 2007-05-16 at 14:47 -0700, David Miller wrote:
From: "Antonino A. Daplas" <adaplas@gmail.com> Date: Thu, 17 May 2007 05:17:34 +0800quoted
From: Krzysztof Helt <redacted> This patch puts all SBUS/UPA selection under one option "SBUS/UPA framebuffers" and moves all sparc specific drivers next to them in one group. Signed-off-by: Krzysztof Helt <redacted> Signed-off-by: Antonino Daplas <adaplas@gmail.com>Thanks for cleaning this up. Signed-off-by: David S. Miller <davem@davemloft.net> On a related note I've been trying to figure out how to solve a particular issue on sparc, perhaps you can help? The firmware has properties that we could use to determine exactly which framebuffer device is being used as the console in multi-head situations. Currently there is no easy way to make use of that so the user just gets whatever the framebuffer device probing order gives them which isn't nice and is often wrong.
This is a potential problem for the x86 too, actually.
One idea I have is to provide a way to set some flag in the fbinfo. The flag would indicate that this framebuffer should be used as the primary console by default. Command line options et al. could of course override this.
A flag may be the easiest. But we can also define an arch-specific function (ie, fb_get_primary_device()) in asm/fb.h. With the x86, this can be easily done by checking the IORESOURCE_ROM_SHADOW bit flag. I'll add this for the x86, and then perhaps others can follow suit. Tony ------------------------------------------------------------------------- This SF.net email is sponsored by DB2 Express Download DB2 Express C - the FREE version of DB2 express and take control of your XML. No limits. Just data. Click to get it now. http://sourceforge.net/powerbar/db2/