Re: [PATCH 2.6.20 1/1] fbdev, mm: hecuba/E-Ink fbdev driver
From: Jaya Kumar <hidden>
Date: 2007-02-20 06:11:22
Also in:
linux-mm, lkml
On 2/19/07, Paul Mundt [off-list ref] wrote:
On Mon, Feb 19, 2007 at 11:13:04PM -0500, Jaya Kumar wrote:quoted
Ok. Here's what I'm thinking for abstracting this: fbdev drivers would setup fb_mmap with their own_mmap as usual. In own_mmap, they would do what they normally do and setup a vm_ops. They are free to have their own nopage handler but would set the page_mkwrite handler to be fbdev_deferred_io_mkwrite().The vast majority of drivers do not implement ->fb_mmap(), and with proper abstraction, this should be something that's possible as a direct alternative to drivers/video/fbmem.c:fb_mmap() for the people that want it. Of course it's just as easy to do something like the sbuslib.c route and then have drivers set their ->fb_mmap() from that too.
I was thinking about having that fb_mmap replacement too. But then I got worried because that generic implementation of nopage/etc would need to handle whether the driver's fb memory was vmalloced, kmalloced or a mixture if some do that. So I figured let's aim low and just pull in the core part that does the setup and page tracking stuff. I hope that's okay.
That works for me, though I'd prefer for struct page_list to be done with a scatterlist, then it's trivial to setup from the workqueue context without having to shuffle things around.
Ok. Will check out when implementing. Thanks, jaya ------------------------------------------------------------------------- Take Surveys. Earn Cash. Influence the Future of IT Join SourceForge.net's Techsay panel and you'll get the chance to share your opinions on IT & business topics through brief surveys-and earn cash http://www.techsay.com/default.php?page=join.php&p=sourceforge&CID=DEVDEV