Re: SM501 framebuffer driver
flat view
From: Alex Deucher <hidden>
Date: 2006-10-06 18:14:22
On 10/6/06, Clemens Koller [off-list ref] wrote:
Hello, Bill,quoted
Sorry about starting a new thread, but I was referred to this list/thread by a colleague just a few minutes ago. (OT: it isn't in the archives in SF, either!).Okay, fine! I'll be glad to join the party because we are using the SM501 on PCI of an MPC8540 embedded PowerPC. Searching the list archives, about ten people have had (at least) some hands on the SM501 during the last year. I also got several questions about the driver status off list.quoted
I hate to play "me too!", but I also have an SM501 framebuffer driver in a partial state of development. I'd love to collaborate with others to get a good version pushed upstream.Great! Where shall we collect the code? I have some - a working fb driver kernel module (I did lots of code cleanup, but still needs a lot) - older Xfree86 driver (partially accelerated!?, never tried but code looks good)
As I mentioned earlier, with the exception of dualhead, I've got a working xorg smi501 driver. I'll be adding it to xorg git once I get dualhead working and a few other odds and ends worked out. Alex
- some collected MMCC (Multi Media Companion Chip) drivers/snippets for the other periperals besides the graphics part. - kernel code for an functional complete(?) SM501 implementation for an RTS7751R2D Renesas SH-4 Board running Linux. I am working on the latest 2.6.18 Kernels on PowerPC. But I can also test the SM501 on PCI in an x86 since we have this PCI Demo Board with an SM501G8 AA. On our PPC we use the SM501GF8 AB Chip Revision (F means: RoHS Version). I also mirrored the Silicon Motion's FTP server with lots of Datasheets and reference designs.quoted
One of the challenges I've encountered with this chip is dealing with all the "other stuff" it has onboard. In my driver, I addressed that by creating a whole new bus similar to what Nico did for the UCB1400. I was in the process of getting AC97 working when I figured out that that part of the chip is so braindead, it isn't worth using--- at least on ARM platforms that don't have DMA (which was my case).Oh, I will need to get the AC97 working, too :-/ (my hardware is more or less ready to test some software)quoted
In an upcoming project I need to use the USBH, so I'll be revisiting this issue again soon. I have also cc'd others who have worked with me on this chip. I'd be happy to post code if that makes sense. Or to host a CVS repo or something.Can you host a CVS repo at your place? I don't like SF much. Best greets, Clemens Koller _______________________________ R&D Imaging Devices Anagramm GmbH Rupert-Mayer-Str. 45/1 81379 Muenchen Germany http://www.anagramm.de Phone: +49-89-741518-50 Fax: +49-89-741518-19 ------------------------------------------------------------------------- Take Surveys. Earn Cash. Influence the Future of IT Join SourceForge.net's Techsay panel and you'll get the chance to share your opinions on IT & business topics through brief surveys -- and earn cash http://www.techsay.com/default.php?page=join.php&p=sourceforge&CID=DEVDEV _______________________________________________ Linux-fbdev-devel mailing list Linux-fbdev-devel@lists.sourceforge.net https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/linux-fbdev-devel
------------------------------------------------------------------------- Take Surveys. Earn Cash. Influence the Future of IT Join SourceForge.net's Techsay panel and you'll get the chance to share your opinions on IT & business topics through brief surveys -- and earn cash http://www.techsay.com/default.php?page=join.php&p=sourceforge&CID=DEVDEV