Antonino A. Daplas wrote:

Daniel THOMPSON wrote:

quoted

There has been no further comment since this was posted in early May.
This either means is uncontentious or useless ... I hope the former.

I thought you were still in 'discussion' mode with Geert :-)

I was, but there was no further discussion so I brought it back to you.

Anyway, this should be fine, I'm just a bit worried that it might
break existing user apps that might be used to having modes without
the scan type specified.

I shared this worry which is why my original patch only tagged the,
comparatively rare, interlaced modes. However the current approach (no
optional fields) is slightly cleaner and I took the view that since
no-one on fbdev-devel seems to object ...

-- 
Daniel Thompson (STMicroelectronics) [off-list ref]
1000 Aztec West, Almondsbury, Bristol, BS32 4SQ. 01454 462659

If a car is a horseless carriage then is a motorcycle a horseless horse?