Re: [patch] radeonfb: FB_WAITFORVSYNC implementation
From: Jon Smirl <hidden>
Date: 2005-03-12 16:29:29
On Sat, 12 Mar 2005 18:10:40 +0200, Ville Syrjälä [off-list ref] wrote:
On Sat, Mar 12, 2005 at 11:00:56AM -0500, Jon Smirl wrote:quoted
On Sat, 12 Mar 2005 17:51:39 +0200, Ville Syrjälä [off-list ref] wrote:quoted
It's not a problem if one doesn't use X.Org/XFree86. Also this patch should not affect X.Org/XFree86 users unless they manage to call the FBIO_WAITFORVSYNC ioctl. matroxfb and atyfb both have similar interrupt support and X can still be used with both.Almost all PPC Linux boxes are running radeonfb with Xorg.What's your point? I doubt X.Org uses FBIO_WAITFORSYNC so the patch should not interfere with anything.
Run something on one VT that uses radeonfb with FBIO_WAITFORSYNC. Switch to VT with xorg. Reboot box.
-- Ville Syrjälä syrjala@sci.fi http://www.sci.fi/~syrjala/ ------------------------------------------------------- SF email is sponsored by - The IT Product Guide Read honest & candid reviews on hundreds of IT Products from real users. Discover which products truly live up to the hype. Start reading now. http://ads.osdn.com/?ad_ide95&alloc_id396&opclick _______________________________________________ Linux-fbdev-devel mailing list Linux-fbdev-devel@lists.sourceforge.net https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/linux-fbdev-devel
-- Jon Smirl jonsmirl@gmail.com ------------------------------------------------------- SF email is sponsored by - The IT Product Guide Read honest & candid reviews on hundreds of IT Products from real users. Discover which products truly live up to the hype. Start reading now. http://ads.osdn.com/?ad_ide95&alloc_id396&op=click