Re: Sane behavior of fbset
From: Benjamin Herrenschmidt <benh@kernel.crashing.org>
Date: 2004-06-23 19:46:13
On Wed, 2004-06-23 at 14:00, jsimmons@pentafluge.infradead.org wrote:
quoted
I still think (didn't I repeat it often enough) that the whole idea of stty "inventing" modes based on console size is broken. We simply can't rely on good enough monitor detection & mode list building to be able to pick proper modes. Not only our code is far from ready for that, but it will also call all sort of problems to users (remember you monitors that need different subtle geometry settings for each different mode you use ?) It may have looked like a nice idea, but I think it's just wrong.Its a POSIX standard. You need to yell at them.
I don't remember seeing anything in POSIX regarding tweaking monitor video modes ;)
quoted
fbset sends an ioctl straight to the fbdev, and doesn't update fbcon at the moment. The callback mecanism I added for power management should allow to restore 2.4 functionality there, but this has not been implemented yet afaik.It will be added back. I didn't merge the one from before because it had problems.
-- Benjamin Herrenschmidt [off-list ref] ------------------------------------------------------- This SF.Net email sponsored by Black Hat Briefings & Training. Attend Black Hat Briefings & Training, Las Vegas July 24-29 - digital self defense, top technical experts, no vendor pitches, unmatched networking opportunities. Visit www.blackhat.com