Re: [PATCH] radeonfb(): memmove() fix -- this one works ;-)
From: James Simmons <hidden>
Date: 2004-04-30 16:03:26
Possibly related (same subject, not in this thread)
- 2004-04-30 · Re: [PATCH] radeonfb(): memmove() fix -- this one works ;-) · Benjamin Herrenschmidt <benh@kernel.crashing.org>
- 2004-04-30 · Re: [PATCH] radeonfb(): memmove() fix -- this one works ;-) · James Simmons <hidden>
- 2004-04-29 · Re: [PATCH] radeonfb(): memmove() fix -- this one works ;-) · Benjamin Herrenschmidt <benh@kernel.crashing.org>
- 2004-04-29 · Re: [PATCH] radeonfb(): memmove() fix -- this one works ;-) · Otto Solares <hidden>
- 2004-04-29 · Re: [PATCH] radeonfb(): memmove() fix -- this one works ;-) · James Simmons <hidden>
Excellent news!
Its going to be a little bit before this is complete. I plan for 2.6.X to have this functionality.
I just would suggest as userspace fbdev consumer that is a pain to do development using two different interfaces, if sysfs interface will obsolete the ioctl one, it must have all the mechanics that are present in the ioctl one so no mix of interfaces would be required.
Yeah that is going to be a problem for a while. ------------------------------------------------------- This SF.Net email is sponsored by: Oracle 10g Get certified on the hottest thing ever to hit the market... Oracle 10g. Take an Oracle 10g class now, and we'll give you the exam FREE. http://ads.osdn.com/?ad_id=3149&alloc_id=8166&op=click