Re: matrox ported to new framework?
From: Nicolas Souchu <hidden>
Date: 2003-05-25 08:32:15
On Sat, May 24, 2003 at 10:48:46AM -0700, Jon Smirl wrote:
quoted hunk
--- Nicolas Souchu <nsouch@free.fr> wrote:quoted
Also, I have a AIW (Rage128) 32MB that is neither supported by 2.4.9 nor by 2.5.69. Any hint?Not all of the Rage128 PCI ids are in the id table. Just try adding all of the ones from the kernel include file. I have yet to find one that didn't work. I believe the ID for the AGP AIW is missing from the driver's table.
This is not what I meant. The id is already in the table
but when booting with the framebuffer activated, I get
garbage on the screen.
The detail is:
none1@pci1:0:0: class=0x030000 card=0x00281002 chip=0x52461002 rev=0x00 hdr=0x00
vendor = 'ATI Technologies'
device = 'Rage 128 GL AGP 2x Rage Fury 16/32MB'
class = display
subclass = VGA
I have the PCI AIW 1002:5044. Something is strange with the driver on 2.5.69. It will work if compiled in, but it won't initialize with a modprobe. There is
I use the driver only wired in the kernel. You certainly need more inputs to digg. How should I produce debug output? Nicholas -- Nicholas Souchu - nsouch@free.fr ------------------------------------------------------- This SF.net email is sponsored by: ObjectStore. If flattening out C++ or Java code to make your application fit in a relational database is painful, don't do it! Check out ObjectStore. Now part of Progress Software. http://www.objectstore.net/sourceforge