Re: Some questions
flat view
From: Antonino Daplas <hidden>
Date: 2003-03-11 20:10:59
On Wed, 2003-03-12 at 00:29, James Simmons wrote:
quoted
So, I think fbcon should also detect if the previous console is not fbcon (ie previous con > last_fbvc || previous con < first_fbvc), and if it isn't, force an fb_set_par.This whole idea of mapping a specific VC to a specific piece of hardware is just plain dumb and overly complex. The new console system will allocate a set of 16 console to each independent VT.
Well, you have info->currcon, fg_console etc... No mapping is done, fbcon will just keep track of the tty's it's currently switched to (vt.c does it, and so does fbcon_switch), and fbcon will just look if the vc has a valid PID (which means a process installed its own vc) and therefore not trust it to completely preserve the graphics state. Note that X does something like this to protect itself. When switch from console to X, it refreshes its own registers. I think you may need some support for this. Several have already reported that switching from X to a console results in a corrupted display which can be cleared by doing an fbset. The choices are: 1. refresh the registers at every switch - slowest but guarantees hardware state is always preserved 2. do not refresh unless var changed - fasted but can result in corruption/crash if registers were changed behind the back of fbdev 3. selective refresh - do not refresh if switching between "trusted" consoles, refresh if switching from "untrusted" consoles. 4. Find a method to detect if the registers were changed behind the back of fbdev. Tony ------------------------------------------------------- This SF.net email is sponsored by:Crypto Challenge is now open! Get cracking and register here for some mind boggling fun and the chance of winning an Apple iPod: http://ads.sourceforge.net/cgi-bin/redirect.pl?thaw0031en