On Thu, 2003-02-20 at 11:58, James Simmons wrote:

quoted

(3) persuade me that I want to write matroxcon and forget about fbcon at all, or

This is the best solution. 

And then we will have sbuscon as well, thus two places where
putcs() is necessary.

I don't understand, but I do hope that at some point it will be
realized that maybe allowing fbcon to generically handle putcs()
hardware is beneficial.

I can dream. :-)



-------------------------------------------------------
This SF.net email is sponsored by: SlickEdit Inc. Develop an edge.
The most comprehensive and flexible code editor you can use.
Code faster. C/C++, C#, Java, HTML, XML, many more. FREE 30-Day Trial.
www.slickedit.com/sourceforge