Thread (7 messages) 7 messages, 5 authors, 2003-01-15

Re: video dir reorg

From: Sven Luther <hidden>
Date: 2003-01-14 21:26:56

On Tue, Jan 14, 2003 at 09:22:36AM -0800, Jon Smirl wrote:
quoted hunk ↗ jump to hunk
--- Sven Luther <luther@dpt-info.u-strasbg.fr> wrote:
quoted
I think Linus rejected this last time James
submitted it.
Didn't the last patch just move the DRM directory from
driver/char into the video directory.?
There is a response of linus in the mailing list archive about this, i
don't remember nor checked if it was only the first time, or not. I
think the objection was about complicate to supervise diffs.
This could be done in two steps. First split out the
fb console driver files into their own directory and
then sort out the hardware drivers more. Then if the
DRM merge gets ok'd everything will be ready.

In the config system I don't like how you have to
enable driver support for the same piece of hardware
in two different places. I also don't like looking in
two different places for the source to drivers for the
same hardware.

What is Linus' take on merging a card's fb and drm
drivers into a single module in the long run?
Well, the problem is that the fb drivers are maintained by us, and the
drm drivers are maintained by the DRI.

Also, i think the drm drivers should compile not only on linux, but on
other oses too (BSDs at least).

Also, i believe some of the XFree86 guys don't like fbdevs.

Friendly,

Sven Luther


-------------------------------------------------------
This SF.NET email is sponsored by: Take your first step towards giving 
your online business a competitive advantage. Test-drive a Thawte SSL 
certificate - our easy online guide will show you how. Click here to get 
started: http://ads.sourceforge.net/cgi-bin/redirect.pl?thaw0027en
Keyboard shortcuts
hback out one level
jnext message in thread
kprevious message in thread
ldrill in
Escclose help / fold thread tree
?toggle this help