Thread (6 messages) flat view 6 messages, 4 authors, 2003-01-10

Re: [Linux-fbdev-devel] Re: xxx_check_var

From: Geert Uytterhoeven <geert@linux-m68k.org>
Date: 2002-12-22 12:10:54
Also in: lkml

On Tue, 10 Dec 2002, James Simmons wrote:
quoted
quoted
When I look at atyfb_check_var or aty128fb_check_var, I see that they
will alter the contents of *info->par.  Isn't this a bad thing?  My
Yes, this wrong, and afaik, it's your original port to 2.5 that did that
;)
Yeap. The idea of check_var is to validate a mode. Note modedb uses just
check_var. It is okay to READ the values in your par. You shouldn't alter
the values in par.
Perhaps it makes sense to make the info parameter of fb_check_var() const to
prevent this from happening?

Gr{oetje,eeting}s,

						Geert

--
Geert Uytterhoeven -- There's lots of Linux beyond ia32 -- geert@linux-m68k.org

In personal conversations with technical people, I call myself a hacker. But
when I'm talking to journalists I just say "programmer" or something like that.
							    -- Linus Torvalds
Keyboard shortcuts
hback out one level
jnext message in thread
kprevious message in thread
ldrill in
Escclose help / fold thread tree
?toggle this help