Re: atyfb and radeonfb

From
Benjamin Herrenschmidt <benh@kernel.crashing.org>
Date
2002-11-12 23:09:29
Reply to
Steven Newbury, 2002-11-08
On Fri, 2002-11-08 at 16:28, Steven Newbury wrote:
Is atyfb in 2.4 known to work with recent Mach64 chips like Rage XL? 
When I install the driver it detects the chip but results in just a 
black screen.  I also noticed that it detects WRAM, whereas I am certain 
it should be SGRAM.  The XFree86 driver detects everything ok and just 
works.
Well, I don't know if Geert still have much time to maintain
this driver, any help implementing the missing features would
be nice ;)
I have also noticed that the radeonfb driver lacks support for 
initialising the card if the BIOS hasn't already done it.  I have 
recently changed from a matrox setup where the matroxfb driver would 
initialise any matrox cards found irrespective of whether the BIOS 
decided to do it unless it was told not to.  Is there any chance that 
this functionality is going to be added to the radeonfb driver?  In 
2.5/6 perhaps?
If you can get ATI to provide POST code for every single ASIC
rev. out there, that may be a good start.

Ben.



-------------------------------------------------------
This sf.net email is sponsored by: To learn the basics of securing 
your web site with SSL, click here to get a FREE TRIAL of a Thawte 
Server Certificate: http://www.gothawte.com/rd524.html
Thread (5 messages) 5 messages, 5 authors, last reply 2002-11-21
Keyboard shortcuts
hback out one level
jnext message in thread / next series-diff position
kprevious message in thread / previous series-diff position
ldrill in
Escclose help / fold thread tree
?toggle this help