Thread (1 message) 1 message, 1 author, 2002-05-29
  • (off-list ancestor, not in this archive)
  • Re: Linux 2.5.19 · Russell King <hidden> · 2002-05-29

Re: Linux 2.5.19

From: Russell King <hidden>
Date: 2002-05-29 23:26:09
Also in: lkml

On Thu, May 30, 2002 at 12:22:25AM +0200, Martin Dalecki wrote:
Dear Russell why don't you just abuse Linus as a spinlock for this kind
of synchronization its his job. No need to get angry at this.
Hey it's developement series time...
The fundamental point I'm making is people shouldn't go around taking
changes randomly from maintainers trees, and believing that they know
far better than the maintainer what they're doing, especially when they
don't have the hardware to even try it out, and go submitting these
changes to Linus without even asking about it first...  after the
maintainer has been very careful and explicitly not submitted
the change because they have very good reasons not to.

What if I were to take, say, Mochel's experimental tree and send some
random alpha code to Linus?  Let anarchy rule!

-- 
Russell King (rmk@arm.linux.org.uk)                The developer of ARM Linux
             http://www.arm.linux.org.uk/personal/aboutme.html


_______________________________________________________________

Don't miss the 2002 Sprint PCS Application Developer's Conference
August 25-28 in Las Vegas -- http://devcon.sprintpcs.com/adp/index.cfm
Keyboard shortcuts
hback out one level
jnext message in thread
kprevious message in thread
ldrill in
Escclose help / fold thread tree
?toggle this help