Re: [PATCH 6.16 000/627] 6.16.1-rc1 review
From: Zhang Yi <hidden>
Date: 2025-08-14 01:27:55
Also in:
linux-fsdevel, linux-patches, linux-perf-users, lkml, ltp, qemu-devel, stable
On 2025/8/13 22:53, Greg Kroah-Hartman wrote:
On Wed, Aug 13, 2025 at 08:01:51PM +0530, Naresh Kamboju wrote:quoted
Hi Greg,quoted
quoted
2) The following list of LTP syscalls failure noticed on qemu-arm64 with stable-rc 6.16.1-rc1 with CONFIG_ARM64_64K_PAGES=y build configuration. Most failures report ENOSPC (28) or mkswap errors, which may be related to disk space handling in the 64K page configuration on qemu-arm64. The issue is reproducible on multiple runs. * qemu-arm64, ltp-syscalls - 64K page size test failures list, - fallocate04 - fallocate05 - fdatasync03 - fsync01 - fsync04 - ioctl_fiemap01 - swapoff01 - swapoff02 - swapon01 - swapon02 - swapon03 - sync01 - sync_file_range02 - syncfs01 Reproducibility: - 64K config above listed test fails - 4K config above listed test pass. Regression Analysis: - New regression? yesRegression from 6.16? Or just from 6.15.y?Based on available data, the issue is not present in v6.16 or v6.15. Anders, bisected this regression and found, ext4: correct the reserved credits for extent conversion [ Upstream commit 95ad8ee45cdbc321c135a2db895d48b374ef0f87 ] Report lore link, https://lore.kernel.org/stable/CA+G9fYtBnCSa2zkaCn-oZKYz8jz5FZj0HS7DjSfMeamq3AXqNg@mail.gmail.com/ (local)Great, and that's also affecting 6.17-rc1 so we are "bug compatible"? :)
Hi, This issue has already fixed in 6.17-rc1 through this series: https://lore.kernel.org/linux-ext4/20250707140814.542883-1-yi.zhang@huaweicloud.com/ (local) To fix this issue in 6.16, it's necessary to backport the whole series instead of just pick 5137d6c8906b ("ext4: fix insufficient credits calculation in ext4_meta_trans_blocks()") and 95ad8ee45cdb {"ext4: correct the reserved credits for extent conversion"). Otherwise, this will make the problem more likely to occur. Thanks, Yi.