Thread (26 messages) 26 messages, 4 authors, 2025-08-15
STALE337d LANDED

[PATCH v5 13/13] fsverity: check IS_VERITY() in fsverity_cleanup_inode()

From: Eric Biggers <ebiggers@kernel.org>
Date: 2025-08-10 08:00:13
Also in: ceph-devel, linux-btrfs, linux-f2fs-devel, linux-fscrypt, linux-fsdevel
Subsystem: fsverity: read-only file-based authenticity protection, the rest · Maintainers: Eric Biggers, Theodore Y. Ts'o, Linus Torvalds

Since getting the address of the fsverity_info has gotten a bit more
expensive, make fsverity_cleanup_inode() check for IS_VERITY() instead.
This avoids adding more overhead to non-verity files.

This assumes that verity info is never set when !IS_VERITY(), which is
currently true, but add a VFS_WARN_ON_ONCE() that asserts that.  (This
of course defeats the optimization, but only when CONFIG_VFS_DEBUG=y.)

Signed-off-by: Eric Biggers <ebiggers@kernel.org>
---
 include/linux/fsverity.h | 9 ++++++++-
 1 file changed, 8 insertions(+), 1 deletion(-)
diff --git a/include/linux/fsverity.h b/include/linux/fsverity.h
index 844f7b8b56bbc..5bc7280425a71 100644
--- a/include/linux/fsverity.h
+++ b/include/linux/fsverity.h
@@ -188,12 +188,19 @@ void __fsverity_cleanup_inode(struct inode *inode);
  *
  * Filesystems must call this on inode eviction to free the inode's verity info.
  */
 static inline void fsverity_cleanup_inode(struct inode *inode)
 {
-	if (*fsverity_info_addr(inode))
+	/*
+	 * Only IS_VERITY() inodes can have verity info, so start by checking
+	 * for IS_VERITY() (which is faster than retrieving the pointer to the
+	 * verity info).  This minimizes overhead for non-verity inodes.
+	 */
+	if (IS_VERITY(inode))
 		__fsverity_cleanup_inode(inode);
+	else
+		VFS_WARN_ON_ONCE(*fsverity_info_addr(inode) != NULL);
 }
 
 /* read_metadata.c */
 
 int fsverity_ioctl_read_metadata(struct file *filp, const void __user *uarg);
-- 
2.50.1
Keyboard shortcuts
hback out one level
jnext message in thread
kprevious message in thread
ldrill in
Escclose help / fold thread tree
?toggle this help