Thread (36 messages) 36 messages, 7 authors, 2023-09-19

Re: [PATCH v7 08/13] fs: drop the timespec64 argument from update_time

From: Mike Marshall <hubcap@omnibond.com>
Date: 2023-08-09 18:38:24
Also in: ceph-devel, linux-btrfs, linux-cifs, linux-f2fs-devel, linux-fsdevel, linux-mm, linux-nfs, linux-unionfs, linux-xfs, lkml, ntfs3, ocfs2-devel, v9fs

I've been following this patch on fsdevel... is there a
remote I could fetch with a branch that has this in it?

-Mike

On Wed, Aug 9, 2023 at 8:32 AM Christian Brauner [off-list ref] wrote:
On Mon, Aug 07, 2023 at 03:38:39PM -0400, Jeff Layton wrote:
quoted
Now that all of the update_time operations are prepared for it, we can
drop the timespec64 argument from the update_time operation. Do that and
remove it from some associated functions like inode_update_time and
inode_needs_update_time.

Signed-off-by: Jeff Layton <jlayton@kernel.org>
---
 fs/bad_inode.c           |  3 +--
 fs/btrfs/inode.c         |  3 +--
 fs/btrfs/volumes.c       |  4 +---
 fs/fat/fat.h             |  3 +--
 fs/fat/misc.c            |  2 +-
 fs/gfs2/inode.c          |  3 +--
 fs/inode.c               | 30 +++++++++++++-----------------
 fs/overlayfs/inode.c     |  2 +-
 fs/overlayfs/overlayfs.h |  2 +-
 fs/ubifs/file.c          |  3 +--
 fs/ubifs/ubifs.h         |  2 +-
 fs/xfs/xfs_iops.c        |  1 -
 include/linux/fs.h       |  4 ++--
This was missing the conversion of fs/orangefs orangefs_update_time()
causing the build to fail. So at some point kbuild will yell here.
Fwiw, I've fixed that up in-tree.
Keyboard shortcuts
hback out one level
jnext message in thread
kprevious message in thread
ldrill in
Escclose help / fold thread tree
?toggle this help