Re: [Ocfs2-devel] [PATCH v2 08/14] ocfs2: replace ll_rw_block()
From: Joseph Qi <joseph.qi@linux.alibaba.com>
Date: 2022-09-06 01:06:34
Also in:
linux-fsdevel, lkml, ocfs2-devel
On 9/1/22 9:34 PM, Zhang Yi via Ocfs2-devel wrote:
ll_rw_block() is not safe for the sync read path because it cannot guarantee that submitting read IO if the buffer has been locked. We could get false positive EIO after wait_on_buffer() if the buffer has been locked by others. So stop using ll_rw_block() in ocfs2. Signed-off-by: Zhang Yi <yi.zhang@huawei.com>
Looks good to me. Reviewed-by: Joseph Qi <joseph.qi@linux.alibaba.com>
quoted hunk ↗ jump to hunk
--- fs/ocfs2/aops.c | 2 +- fs/ocfs2/super.c | 4 +--- 2 files changed, 2 insertions(+), 4 deletions(-)diff --git a/fs/ocfs2/aops.c b/fs/ocfs2/aops.c index af4157f61927..1d65f6ef00ca 100644 --- a/fs/ocfs2/aops.c +++ b/fs/ocfs2/aops.c@@ -636,7 +636,7 @@ int ocfs2_map_page_blocks(struct page *page, u64 *p_blkno, !buffer_new(bh) && ocfs2_should_read_blk(inode, page, block_start) && (block_start < from || block_end > to)) { - ll_rw_block(REQ_OP_READ, 1, &bh); + bh_read_nowait(bh, 0); *wait_bh++=bh; }diff --git a/fs/ocfs2/super.c b/fs/ocfs2/super.c index e2cc9eec287c..26b4c2bfee49 100644 --- a/fs/ocfs2/super.c +++ b/fs/ocfs2/super.c@@ -1764,9 +1764,7 @@ static int ocfs2_get_sector(struct super_block *sb, if (!buffer_dirty(*bh)) clear_buffer_uptodate(*bh); unlock_buffer(*bh); - ll_rw_block(REQ_OP_READ, 1, bh); - wait_on_buffer(*bh); - if (!buffer_uptodate(*bh)) { + if (bh_read(*bh, 0) < 0) { mlog_errno(-EIO); brelse(*bh); *bh = NULL;