* Jeff Layton:
quoted hunk
@@ -411,6 +413,21 @@ and corresponds to the number in the first field in one of the records in
For further information on the above fields, see
.BR inode (7).
.\"
+.TP
+.I stx_ino_version
+The inode version, also known as the inode change attribute. This
+value must change any time there is an inode status change. Any
+operation that would cause the
+.I stx_ctime
+to change must also cause
+.I stx_ino_version
+to change, even when there is no apparent change to the
+.I stx_ctime
+due to coarse timestamp granularity.
+.IP
+An observer cannot infer anything about the nature or magnitude of the change
+from the value of this field. A change in this value only indicates that
+there has been an explicit change in the inode.
What happens if the file system does not support i_version?
quoted hunk
diff --git a/man7/inode.7 b/man7/inode.7
index 9b255a890720..d5e0890a52c0 100644
--- a/man7/inode.7
+++ b/man7/inode.7
@@ -184,6 +184,18 @@ Last status change timestamp (ctime)
This is the file's last status change timestamp.
It is changed by writing or by setting inode information
(i.e., owner, group, link count, mode, etc.).
+.TP
+Inode version (i_version)
+(not returned in the \fIstat\fP structure); \fIstatx.stx_ino_version\fP
+.IP
+This is the inode change attribute. Any operation that would result in a change
+to \fIstatx.stx_ctime\fP must result in a change to this value. The value must
+change even in the case where the ctime change is not evident due to coarse
+timestamp granularity.
+.IP
+An observer cannot infer anything from the returned value about the nature or
+magnitude of the change. If the returned value is different from the last time
+it was checked, then something has made an explicit change to the inode.
What is the wraparound behavior for i_version? Does it use the full
64-bit range?
If the system crashes without flushing disks, is it possible to observe
new file contents without a change of i_version?
Thanks,
Florian