Thread (3 messages) 3 messages, 2 authors, 2022-08-15

Re: [PATCH] Documentation: ext4: correct the document about superblock

flat view

From: JunChao Sun <hidden>
Date: 2022-08-15 12:37:19
Also in: linux-doc

Thanks for your suggestions, I will send patchv2.

On Mon, Aug 15, 2022 at 5:21 PM Bagas Sanjaya [off-list ref] wrote:
On Sun, Aug 14, 2022 at 02:00:16AM -0700, JunChao Sun wrote:
quoted
Correct some questions like this:
s_lastcheck_hi field should be upper 8 bits of the
s_lastcheck field, rather than itself.
diff --git a/Documentation/filesystems/ext4/super.rst b/Documentation/filesystems/ext4/super.rst
index 268888522e35..0152888cac29 100644
--- a/Documentation/filesystems/ext4/super.rst
+++ b/Documentation/filesystems/ext4/super.rst
@@ -456,15 +456,15 @@ The ext4 superblock is laid out as follows in
    * - 0x277
      - __u8
      - s_lastcheck_hi
-     - Upper 8 bits of the s_lastcheck_hi field.
+     - Upper 8 bits of the s_lastcheck field.
    * - 0x278
      - __u8
      - s_first_error_time_hi
-     - Upper 8 bits of the s_first_error_time_hi field.
+     - Upper 8 bits of the s_first_error_time field.
    * - 0x279
      - __u8
      - s_last_error_time_hi
-     - Upper 8 bits of the s_last_error_time_hi field.
+     - Upper 8 bits of the s_last_error_time field.
    * - 0x27A
      - __u8
      - s_pad[2]
The diff looks OK, but the description should be:
"The description of s_lastcheck_hi, s_first_error_time_hi, and
s_last_error_time_hi fields refer to themselves, while these means
referring to upper 8 bits (byte) of corresponding fields (s_lastcheck,
s_first_error_time, and s_last_error_time). Correct the mistake."

Thanks.

--
An old man doll... just what I always wanted! - Clara
Keyboard shortcuts
hback out one level
jnext message in thread
kprevious message in thread
ldrill in
Escclose help / fold thread tree
?toggle this help