[PATCH 1/2] fs: ext4: Consolidate checks for resize of bigalloc into ext4_resize_begin · Josh Triplett <josh@joshtriplett.org> · 2021-06-07
[PATCH 2/2] fs: ext4: Add check to prevent attempting to resize an fs with sparse_super2 · Josh Triplett <josh@joshtriplett.org> · 2021-06-07
Re: [PATCH 2/2] fs: ext4: Add check to prevent attempting to resize an fs with sparse_super2 · "Theodore Ts'o" <tytso@mit.edu> · 2021-06-24
Re: [PATCH 1/2] fs: ext4: Consolidate checks for resize of bigalloc into ext4_resize_begin · "Theodore Ts'o" <tytso@mit.edu> · 2021-06-24
Re: [PATCH 1/2] fs: ext4: Consolidate checks for resize of bigalloc into ext4_resize_begin · "Theodore Ts'o" <tytso@mit.edu> · 2021-07-01
Re: [PATCH 1/2] fs: ext4: Consolidate checks for resize of bigalloc into ext4_resize_begin · Josh Triplett <josh@joshtriplett.org> · 2021-07-01
Re: [PATCH 1/2] fs: ext4: Consolidate checks for resize of bigalloc into ext4_resize_begin · "Theodore Ts'o" <tytso@mit.edu> · 2021-07-01

Re: [PATCH 1/2] fs: ext4: Consolidate checks for resize of bigalloc into ext4_resize_begin

From: "Theodore Ts'o" <tytso@mit.edu>
Date: 2021-07-01 14:41:52
Also in: lkml

On Wed, Jun 30, 2021 at 07:17:50PM -0700, Josh Triplett wrote:

Sorry to have missed the third case here, and no problems with the
revert. I'm hoping that the second patch can be kept as-is, assuming
there's no support for resizing sparse_super2 by any code path?

No worries, I missed it too in my review.  Yes, I only reverted the
first patch, and kept the second one.  There was a minor conflict in
the revert, but it was easily fixed up.

    	    	       	      	    - Ted

`h`	back out one level
`j`	next message in thread
`k`	previous message in thread
`l`	drill in
`Esc`	close help / fold thread tree
`?`	toggle this help