Re: [PATCH 07/13] xfs: Convert to use invalidate_lock
From: "Darrick J. Wong" <djwong@kernel.org>
Date: 2021-05-26 15:32:54
Also in:
ceph-devel, linux-cifs, linux-f2fs-devel, linux-fsdevel, linux-mm, linux-xfs
On Wed, May 26, 2021 at 12:18:40PM +0200, Jan Kara wrote:
On Tue 25-05-21 14:37:29, Darrick J. Wong wrote:quoted
On Tue, May 25, 2021 at 03:50:44PM +0200, Jan Kara wrote:quoted
Use invalidate_lock instead of XFS internal i_mmap_lock. The intended purpose of invalidate_lock is exactly the same. Note that the locking in __xfs_filemap_fault() slightly changes as filemap_fault() already takes invalidate_lock. Reviewed-by: Christoph Hellwig <hch@lst.de> CC: <redacted> CC: "Darrick J. Wong" <redacted>It's djwong@kernel.org now.OK, updated.quoted
quoted
@@ -355,8 +358,11 @@ xfs_isilocked( if (lock_flags & (XFS_MMAPLOCK_EXCL|XFS_MMAPLOCK_SHARED)) { if (!(lock_flags & XFS_MMAPLOCK_SHARED)) - return !!ip->i_mmaplock.mr_writer; - return rwsem_is_locked(&ip->i_mmaplock.mr_lock); + return !debug_locks || + lockdep_is_held_type( + &VFS_I(ip)->i_mapping->invalidate_lock, + 0); + return rwsem_is_locked(&VFS_I(ip)->i_mapping->invalidate_lock);This doesn't look right... If lockdep is disabled, we always return true for xfs_isilocked(ip, XFS_MMAPLOCK_EXCL) even if nobody holds the lock? Granted, you probably just copy-pasted from the IOLOCK_SHARED clause beneath it. Er... oh right, preichl was messing with all that... https://lore.kernel.org/linux-xfs/20201016021005.548850-2-preichl@redhat.com/ (local)Indeed copy-paste programming ;) It certainly makes the assertions happy but useless. Should I pull the patch you reference into the series? It seems to have been uncontroversial and reviewed. Or will you pull the series to xfs tree so I can just rebase on top?
The full conversion series introduced assertion failures because lockdep can't handle some of the ILOCK usage patterns, specifically the fact that a thread sometimes takes the ILOCK but then hands the inode to a workqueue to avoid overflowing the first thread's stack. That's why it never got merged into the xfs tree. However, that kind of switcheroo isn't done with the MMAPLOCK/invalidate_lock, so you could simply pull the patch I linked above into your series. --D
Honza -- Jan Kara [off-list ref] SUSE Labs, CR