Re: [RFC PATCH v2 7/7] ext4: fix race between blkdev_releasepage() and ext4_put_super()
From: "Theodore Ts'o" <tytso@mit.edu>
Date: 2021-04-23 14:41:27
Also in:
linux-fsdevel
From: "Theodore Ts'o" <tytso@mit.edu>
Date: 2021-04-23 14:41:27
Also in:
linux-fsdevel
On Thu, Apr 22, 2021 at 11:04:11AM +0200, Jan Kara wrote:
Yes, I understand that. What I was more asking about is: Does it really matter we leave those buffer heads and journal heads unreclaimed. I understand it could be triggering premature OOM in theory but is it a problem in practice? Was there some observed practical case for which this was added or was it just added due to the theoretical concern?
I was doing some research, and found the mail thread which inspired bdev_try_to_free_page(): https://lore.kernel.org/linux-ext4/20081202200647.72cc5807.toshi.okajima@jp.fujitsu.com/ (local) From what I can tell Toshi Okajima did have a test workload which would trigger blkdev_releasepage(). He didn't specify it in the mail thread as near as I can tell, but he did use it to test the page. Thinking about it, it shouldn't be hard to trigger it via something like: find /mnt -print0 | xargs -0 touch in a memory contrained box with a large file system attached (a bookshelf NAS scenario). Under the right circumstances, I'm pretty sure a premature OOM could be demonstrated. - Ted