Re: [RFC] inode.i_opflags - Usage of two different locking schemes
From: "Theodore Ts'o" <tytso@mit.edu>
Date: 2021-03-05 15:19:31
Also in:
lkml
From: "Theodore Ts'o" <tytso@mit.edu>
Date: 2021-03-05 15:19:31
Also in:
lkml
On Fri, Mar 05, 2021 at 02:10:09PM +0100, Alexander Lochmann wrote:
Hi folks, I've stumbled across an interesting locking scheme. It's related to struct inode, more precisely it is an mqueue inode. Our results show that inode:mqueue.i_opflags is read with i_rwsem being hold. In d_flags_for_inode, and do_inode_permission the i_lock is used to read and write i_opflags. Is this a real locking scheme? Is a lock needed to access i_opflags at all? What is the magic behind this contradiction? I've put the report of the counterexamples on our webserver: https://ess.cs.tu-dortmund.de/lockdoc-bugs/cex-inode-mqueue.html. It contains the stacktraces leading to those accesses, and the locks that were actually held.
1) I don't see where i_opflags is being read in ipc/mqueue.c at all,
either with or without i_rwsem.
2) I'm not sure what this has to do with ext4?
- Ted