Re: [PATCH 1/4] e2fsck: don't ignore return values in e2fsck_rewrite_extent_tree
From: Благодаренко Артём <hidden>
Date: 2021-02-20 08:59:15
Hello Harshad, ext2fs_iblk_set in the same e2fsck_rewrite_extent_tee returns a return code, but code is ignored. Could you also add check there? Best regards, Artem Blagodarenko
quoted hunk ↗ jump to hunk
On 20 Feb 2021, at 00:03, Harshad Shirwadkar [off-list ref] wrote: From: Harshad Shirwadkar <redacted> Don't ignore return values of ext2fs_read/write_inode_full() in e2fsck_rewrite_extent_tree. Signed-off-by: Harshad Shirwadkar <redacted> --- e2fsck/extents.c | 12 ++++++------ 1 file changed, 6 insertions(+), 6 deletions(-)diff --git a/e2fsck/extents.c b/e2fsck/extents.c index 600dbc97..f48f14ff 100644 --- a/e2fsck/extents.c +++ b/e2fsck/extents.c@@ -290,8 +290,10 @@ errcode_t e2fsck_rewrite_extent_tree(e2fsck_t ctx, struct extent_list *list)errcode_t err; memset(&inode, 0, sizeof(inode)); - ext2fs_read_inode_full(ctx->fs, list->ino, EXT2_INODE(&inode), - sizeof(inode)); + err = ext2fs_read_inode_full(ctx->fs, list->ino, EXT2_INODE(&inode), + sizeof(inode)); + if (err) + return err; /* Skip deleted inodes and inline data files */ if (inode.i_flags & EXT4_INLINE_DATA_FL)@@ -306,10 +308,8 @@ errcode_t e2fsck_rewrite_extent_tree(e2fsck_t ctx, struct extent_list *list)if (err) return err; ext2fs_iblk_set(ctx->fs, EXT2_INODE(&inode), blk_count); - ext2fs_write_inode_full(ctx->fs, list->ino, EXT2_INODE(&inode), - sizeof(inode)); - - return 0; + return ext2fs_write_inode_full(ctx->fs, list->ino, EXT2_INODE(&inode), + sizeof(inode)); } errcode_t e2fsck_read_extents(e2fsck_t ctx, struct extent_list *extents) -- 2.30.0.617.g56c4b15f3c-goog