Re: Aarch64 EXT4FS inode checksum failures - seems to be weak memory ordering issues

On Thu, Jan 7, 2021 at 5:27 PM Theodore Ts'o [off-list ref] wrote:

On Thu, Jan 07, 2021 at 01:37:47PM +0000, Russell King - ARM Linux admin wrote:

quoted

quoted

The gcc bugzilla mentions backports into gcc-linaro, but I do not see
them in my git history.

So, do we raise the minimum gcc version for the kernel as a whole to 5.1
or just for aarch64?

Russell, Arnd, thanks so much for tracking down the root cause of the
bug!

There is one more thing that I wondered about when looking through
the ext4 code: Should it just call the crc32c_le() function directly
instead of going through the crypto layer? It seems that with Ard's
rework from 2018, that can just call the underlying architecture specific
implementation anyway.

I will note that RHEL 7 uses gcc 4.8.  I personally don't have an
objections to requiring developers using RHEL 7 to have to install a
more modern gcc (since I use Debian Testing and gcc 10.2.1, myself,
and gcc 5.1 is so five years ago :-), but I could imagine that being
considered inconvenient for some.

The main users of gcc-4.9 that I recall from previous discussions
were Android and Debian 8, but both of them are done now: Debian 8
has reached its end of life last summer, and Android uses clang
for building new kernels.

       Arnd