Thread (8 messages) 8 messages, 4 authors, 2020-03-12

Re: Is ext4_dio_read_iter() broken? - and xfs_file_dio_aio_read()

From: Christoph Hellwig <hch@lst.de>
Date: 2020-03-12 10:42:43
Also in: linux-fsdevel, linux-xfs

On Thu, Mar 12, 2020 at 10:07:57AM +0000, David Howells wrote:
David Howells [off-list ref] wrote:
quoted
Is ext4_dio_read_iter() broken?  It calls:

	file_accessed(iocb->ki_filp);

at the end of the function - but surely iocb should be expected to have been
freed when iocb->ki_complete() was called?
The iocb is refcounted and only completed when the refcount hits zero,
and an extra reference is held until the submission has completed.
Take a look at iocb_put().
I think it's actually worse than that.  You also can't call
inode_unlock_shared(inode) because you no longer own a ref on the inode since
->ki_complete() is expected to call fput() on iocb->ki_filp.
the file reference also hold an inode reference.
Yes, you own a shared lock on it, but unless somewhere along the
fput-dput-iput chain the inode lock is taken exclusively, the inode can be
freed whilst you're still holding the lock.

Oh - and ext4_dax_read_iter() is also similarly broken.
In addition to that DAX never executes asynchronously.
And xfs_file_dio_aio_read() appears to be broken as it touches the inode after
calling iomap_dio_rw() to unlock it.
Same as above.
Keyboard shortcuts
hback out one level
jnext message in thread
kprevious message in thread
ldrill in
Escclose help / fold thread tree
?toggle this help