Re: [PATCH v2] iomap: return partial I/O count on error in iomap_dio_bio_actor
From: Ritesh Harjani <hidden>
Date: 2020-02-21 04:51:18
Also in:
linux-fsdevel
On 2/20/20 8:53 PM, Goldwyn Rodrigues wrote:
quoted hunk ↗ jump to hunk
In case of a block device error, written parameter in iomap_end() is zero as opposed to the amount of submitted I/O. Filesystems such as btrfs need to account for the I/O in ordered extents, even if it resulted in an error. Having (incomplete) submitted bytes in written gives the filesystem the amount of data which has been submitted before the error occurred, and the filesystem code can choose how to use it. The final returned error for iomap_dio_rw() is set by iomap_dio_complete(). Partial writes in direct I/O are considered an error. So, ->iomap_end() using written == 0 as error must be changed to written < length. In this case, ext4 is the only user. Signed-off-by: Goldwyn Rodrigues <redacted> --- fs/ext4/inode.c | 2 +- fs/iomap/direct-io.c | 2 +- 2 files changed, 2 insertions(+), 2 deletions(-)diff --git a/fs/ext4/inode.c b/fs/ext4/inode.c index e60aca791d3f..e50e7414351a 100644 --- a/fs/ext4/inode.c +++ b/fs/ext4/inode.c@@ -3475,7 +3475,7 @@ static int ext4_iomap_end(struct inode *inode, loff_t offset, loff_t length, * the I/O. Any blocks that may have been allocated in preparation for * the direct I/O will be reused during buffered I/O. */ - if (flags & (IOMAP_WRITE | IOMAP_DIRECT) && written == 0) + if (flags & (IOMAP_WRITE | IOMAP_DIRECT) && written < length) return -ENOTBLK; return 0;diff --git a/fs/iomap/direct-io.c b/fs/iomap/direct-io.c index 41c1e7c20a1f..01865db1bd09 100644 --- a/fs/iomap/direct-io.c +++ b/fs/iomap/direct-io.c@@ -264,7 +264,7 @@ iomap_dio_bio_actor(struct inode *inode, loff_t pos, loff_t length, size_t n; if (dio->error) { iov_iter_revert(dio->submit.iter, copied); - copied = ret = 0; + ret = 0; goto out; }
But if I am seeing this correctly, even after there was a dio->error if you return copied > 0, then the loop in iomap_dio_rw will continue for next iteration as well. Until the second time it won't copy anything since dio->error is set and from there I guess it may return 0 which will break the loop. Is this the correct flow? Shouldn't the while loop doing iomap_apply in iomap_dio_rw should also break in case of dio->error? Or did I miss anything? -ritesh