Thread (9 messages) 9 messages, 2 authors, 2020-01-08

Re: [PATCH v2 0/6] Support for Casefolding and Encryption

From: Daniel Rosenberg <hidden>
Date: 2020-01-08 21:24:19
Also in: linux-doc, linux-f2fs-devel, linux-fscrypt, linux-fsdevel, lkml

On Wed, Jan 8, 2020 at 10:50 AM Theodore Y. Ts'o [off-list ref] wrote:
On Mon, Jan 06, 2020 at 09:16:32PM -0800, Daniel Rosenberg wrote:
quoted
changes:
fscrypt moved to separate thread to rebase on fscrypt dev branch
addressed feedback, plus some minor fixes
What branch was this based on?  There is no fscrypt dev branch, so I
took the fscrypt master branch, and then applied your fscrypt patches,
and then I tried to apply this patch series.  I got patch conflicts
starting with the very first patch.

Applying: TMP: fscrypt: Add support for casefolding with encryption
error: patch failed: fs/crypto/Kconfig:9
error: fs/crypto/Kconfig: patch does not apply
error: patch failed: fs/crypto/fname.c:12
error: fs/crypto/fname.c: patch does not apply
error: patch failed: fs/crypto/fscrypt_private.h:12
error: fs/crypto/fscrypt_private.h: patch does not apply
error: patch failed: fs/crypto/keysetup.c:192
error: fs/crypto/keysetup.c: patch does not apply
error: patch failed: fs/crypto/policy.c:67
error: fs/crypto/policy.c: patch does not apply
error: patch failed: fs/inode.c:20
error: fs/inode.c: patch does not apply
error: patch failed: include/linux/fscrypt.h:127
error: include/linux/fscrypt.h: patch does not apply
Patch failed at 0001 TMP: fscrypt: Add support for casefolding with encryption
hint: Use 'git am --show-current-patch' to see the failed patch
When you have resolved this problem, run "git am --continue".
If you prefer to skip this patch, run "git am --skip" instead.
To restore the original branch and stop patching, run "git am --abort".

                                                  - Ted

--
To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an email to kernel-team+unsubscribe@android.com.
This is based off of ToT master. I put in a dummy fscrypt patch so you
wouldn't need to rebase on top of fscrypt, but I could just do future
patch sets all on top of fscrypt-dev. I guess my attempt to make it
easier just made it more confusing :(
Keyboard shortcuts
hback out one level
jnext message in thread
kprevious message in thread
ldrill in
Escclose help / fold thread tree
?toggle this help