Re: [PATCH v2 0/6] Support for Casefolding and Encryption
From: Daniel Rosenberg <hidden>
Date: 2020-01-08 21:24:19
Also in:
linux-doc, linux-f2fs-devel, linux-fscrypt, linux-fsdevel, lkml
On Wed, Jan 8, 2020 at 10:50 AM Theodore Y. Ts'o [off-list ref] wrote:
On Mon, Jan 06, 2020 at 09:16:32PM -0800, Daniel Rosenberg wrote:quoted
changes: fscrypt moved to separate thread to rebase on fscrypt dev branch addressed feedback, plus some minor fixesWhat branch was this based on? There is no fscrypt dev branch, so I took the fscrypt master branch, and then applied your fscrypt patches, and then I tried to apply this patch series. I got patch conflicts starting with the very first patch. Applying: TMP: fscrypt: Add support for casefolding with encryption error: patch failed: fs/crypto/Kconfig:9 error: fs/crypto/Kconfig: patch does not apply error: patch failed: fs/crypto/fname.c:12 error: fs/crypto/fname.c: patch does not apply error: patch failed: fs/crypto/fscrypt_private.h:12 error: fs/crypto/fscrypt_private.h: patch does not apply error: patch failed: fs/crypto/keysetup.c:192 error: fs/crypto/keysetup.c: patch does not apply error: patch failed: fs/crypto/policy.c:67 error: fs/crypto/policy.c: patch does not apply error: patch failed: fs/inode.c:20 error: fs/inode.c: patch does not apply error: patch failed: include/linux/fscrypt.h:127 error: include/linux/fscrypt.h: patch does not apply Patch failed at 0001 TMP: fscrypt: Add support for casefolding with encryption hint: Use 'git am --show-current-patch' to see the failed patch When you have resolved this problem, run "git am --continue". If you prefer to skip this patch, run "git am --skip" instead. To restore the original branch and stop patching, run "git am --abort". - Ted -- To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an email to kernel-team+unsubscribe@android.com.
This is based off of ToT master. I put in a dummy fscrypt patch so you wouldn't need to rebase on top of fscrypt, but I could just do future patch sets all on top of fscrypt-dev. I guess my attempt to make it easier just made it more confusing :(