Re: [RFC] errno.h: Provide EFSCORRUPTED for everybody
From: Geert Uytterhoeven <geert@linux-m68k.org>
Date: 2019-11-01 20:57:48
Also in:
linux-arch, linux-f2fs-devel, linux-fsdevel, linux-xfs, lkml
Hi Valdis, On Thu, Oct 31, 2019 at 2:11 AM Valdis Kletnieks [off-list ref] wrote:
Three questions: (a) ACK/NAK on this patch, (b) should it be all in one patch, or one to add to errno.h and 6 patches for 6 filesystems?), and (c) if one patch, who gets to shepherd it through? There's currently 6 filesystems that have the same #define. Move it into errno.h so it's defined in just one place. Signed-off-by: Valdis Kletnieks <redacted>
Thanks for your patch!
quoted hunk ↗ jump to hunk
--- a/include/uapi/asm-generic/errno.h +++ b/include/uapi/asm-generic/errno.h@@ -98,6 +98,7 @@ #define EINPROGRESS 115 /* Operation now in progress */ #define ESTALE 116 /* Stale file handle */ #define EUCLEAN 117 /* Structure needs cleaning */ +#define EFSCORRUPTED EUCLEAN
I have two questions:
a) Why not use EUCLEAN everywhere instead?
Having two different names for the same errno complicates grepping.
b) Perhaps both errors should use different values? Do they have the
same semantics? I'm not a fs developer, so this is a bit fuzzy to me.
According to Documentation/, one seems to originate in mtd, the
other in xfs.
Gr{oetje,eeting}s,
Geert
--
Geert Uytterhoeven -- There's lots of Linux beyond ia32 -- geert@linux-m68k.org
In personal conversations with technical people, I call myself a hacker. But
when I'm talking to journalists I just say "programmer" or something like that.
-- Linus Torvalds