Thread (7 messages) 7 messages, 4 authors, 2018-01-04

Re: Filesystem crashes due to pages without buffers

From: Leon Romanovsky <leon@kernel.org>
Date: 2018-01-04 06:10:53
Also in: linux-fsdevel, linux-mm, linux-rdma, linux-xfs

On Wed, Jan 03, 2018 at 11:04:30AM +0100, Jan Kara wrote:
Hello,

Over the years I have seen so far unexplained crashed in filesystem's
(ext4, xfs) writeback path due to dirty pages without buffers attached to
them (see [1] and [2] for relatively recent reports). This was confusing as
reclaim takes care not to strip buffers from a dirty page and both
filesystems do add buffers to a page when it is first written to - in
->page_mkwrite() and ->write_begin callbacks.

Recently I have come across a code path that is probably leading to this
inconsistent state and I'd like to discuss how to best fix the problem
because it's not obvious to me. Consider the following race:

CPU1					CPU2

addr = mmap(file1, MAP_SHARED, ...);
fd2 = open(file2, O_DIRECT | O_RDONLY);
read(fd2, addr, len)
  do_direct_IO()
    page = dio_get_page()
      dio_refill_pages()
        iov_iter_get_pages()
	  get_user_pages_fast()
            - page fault
              ->page_mkwrite()
                block_page_mkwrite()
                  lock_page(page);
                  - attaches buffers to page
                  - makes sure blocks are allocated
                  set_page_dirty(page)
              - install writeable PTE
              unlock_page(page);
    submit_page_section(page)
      - submits bio with 'page' as a buffer
					kswapd reclaims pages:
					...
					shrink_page_list()
					  trylock_page(page) - this is the
					    page CPU1 has just faulted in
					  try_to_unmap(page)
					  pageout(page);
					    clear_page_dirty_for_io(page);
					    ->writepage()
					  - let's assume page got written
					    out fast enough, alternatively
					    we could get to the same path as
					    soon as the page IO completes
					  if (page_has_private(page)) {
					    try_to_release_page(page)
					      - reclaims buffers from the
					        page
					   __remove_mapping(page)
					     - fails as DIO code still
					       holds page reference
...

eventually read completes
  dio_bio_complete(bio)
    set_page_dirty_lock(page)
      Bummer, we've just marked the page as dirty without having buffers.
      Eventually writeback will find it and filesystem will complain...

Am I missing something?

The problem here is that filesystems fundamentally assume that a page can
be written to only between ->write_begin - ->write_end (in this interval
the page is locked), or between ->page_mkwrite - ->writepage and above is
an example where this does not hold because when a page reference is
acquired through get_user_pages(), page can get written to by the holder of
the reference and dirtied even after it has been unmapped from page tables
and ->writepage has been called. This is not only a cosmetic issue leading
to assertion failure but it can also lead to data loss, data corruption, or
other unpleasant surprises as filesystems assume page contents cannot be
modified until either ->write_begin() or ->page_mkwrite gets called and
those calls are serialized by proper locking with problematic operations
such as hole punching etc.

I'm not sure how to fix this problem. We could 'simulate' a writeable page
fault in set_page_dirty_lock(). It is a bit ugly since we don't have a
virtual address of the fault, don't hold mmap_sem, etc., possibly
expensive, but it would make filesystems happy. Data stored by GUP user
(e.g. read by DIO in the above case) could still get lost if someone e.g.
punched hole under the buffer or otherwise messed with the underlying
storage of the page while DIO was running but arguably users could expect
such outcome.

Another possible solution would be to make sure page is writeably mapped
until GUP user drops its reference. That would be arguably cleaner but
probably that would mean we have to track number of writeable GUP page
references separately (no space space in struct page is a problem here) and
block page_mkclean() until they are dropped. Also for long term GUP users
like Infiniband or V4L we'd have to come up with some solution as we should
not block page_mkclean() for so long.

As a side note DAX needs some solution for GUP users as well. The problems
are similar there in nature, just much easier to hit. So at least a
solution for long-term GUP users can (and I strongly believe should) be
shared between standard and DAX paths.

Anybody has other ideas how to fix the problem or opinions on which
solution would be better to use or some complications I have missed?
+RDMA

Hi Jan,

I don't have actual proposals how to fix, but wanted to mention that
we have a customer who experiences those failures in his setup.
In his case, it is reproducible in 100% of cases in approximately 2
minutes of run.

His application creates two memory regions with ib_umem_get(), one is
backed by ext4 and another is anonymous. Approximately after two minutes
of data traffic, he stops the system and calls to release those memory
regions with ib_umem_release()->__ib_umem_release()->set_page_dirty_lock().

A couple of seconds later, he hits the following BUG_ON.

[ 1411.545311] ------------[ cut here ]------------
[ 1411.545340] kernel BUG at fs/ext4/inode.c:2297!
[ 1411.545360] invalid opcode: 0000 [#1] SMP
[ 1411.545381] Modules linked in: xt_nat veth ipt_MASQUERADE
nf_nat_masquerade_ipv4 iptable_nat nf_conntrack_ipv4 nf_defrag_ipv4
nf_nat_ipv4 xt_addrtype iptable_filter xt_conntrack nf_nat nf_conntrack
br_netfilter bridge stp llc overlay(T) rdma_ucm(OE) ib_ucm(OE)
rdma_cm(OE) iw_cm(OE) ib_ipoib(OE) ib_cm(OE) ib_uverbs(OE) ib_umad(OE)
mlx5_ib(OE) mlx5_core(OE) mlx4_en(OE) mlx4_ib(OE) ib_core(OE)
mlx4_core(OE) devlink mlx_compat(OE) intel_powerclamp coretemp
intel_rapl iosf_mbi kvm_intel vfat fat kvm irqbypass crc32_pclmul
ghash_clmulni_intel aesni_intel lrw gf128mul ext4 glue_helper
ablk_helper cryptd mbcache jbd2 iTCO_wdt iTCO_vendor_support mxm_wmi
pcspkr sb_edac edac_core i2c_i801 sg mei_me mei shpchp lpc_ich
ipmi_devintf ipmi_si ipmi_msghandler acpi_pad wmi acpi_power_meter
knem(OE) nfsd auth_rpcgss
[ 1411.545744] nfs_acl lockd grace sunrpc ip_tables xfs libcrc32c sd_mod
crc_t10dif crct10dif_generic ast drm_kms_helper crct10dif_pclmul
crct10dif_common syscopyarea sysfillrect crc32c_intel mpt3sas sysimgblt
fb_sys_fops ttm ahci raid_class libahci scsi_transport_sas igb drm
libata dca i2c_algo_bit ptp nvme i2c_core pps_core fjes dm_mirror
dm_region_hash dm_log dm_mod [last unloaded: devlink]
[ 1411.545926] CPU: 6 PID: 13195 Comm: node_runner_w8 Tainted: G W OE
------------ T 3.10.0-514.21.1.el7.debug_bz1368895.x86_64 #1
[ 1411.545975] Hardware name: Quanta Computer Inc D51BP-1U (dual 1G LoM)/S2BP-MB (dual 1G LoM), BIOS S2BP3B04 03/03/2016
[ 1411.546017] task: ffff881e4b323ec0 ti: ffff881e49bbc000 task.ti: ffff881e49bbc000
[ 1411.546047] RIP: 0010:[<ffffffffa07083e5>] [<ffffffffa07083e5>] mpage_prepare_extent_to_map+0x2d5/0x2e0 [ext4]
[ 1411.546103] RSP: 0018:ffff881e49bbfc10 EFLAGS: 00010246
[ 1411.546125] RAX: 001fffff0000003d RBX: ffff881e49bbfc68 RCX: 0000000000000170
[ 1411.546154] RDX: 0000000000000000 RSI: 0000000000000000 RDI: ffff88207ff8dde8
[ 1411.546183] RBP: ffff881e49bbfce8 R08: 0000000000000000 R09: 0000000000000001
[ 1411.546212] R10: 57fe04c2df4f6680 R11: 0000000000000008 R12: 7ffffffffffffe9e
[ 1411.546240] R13: 000000000003ffff R14: ffffea0001449a00 R15: ffff881e49bbfd90
[ 1411.546270] FS: 00007f5dd5de7d40(0000) GS:ffff881fffb80000(0000) knlGS:0000000000000000
[ 1411.546302] CS: 0010 DS: 0000 ES: 0000 CR0: 0000000080050033
[ 1411.546325] CR2: 00007f5b0c5969c0 CR3: 0000001e5e6ae000 CR4: 00000000003407e0
[ 1411.546354] DR0: 0000000000000000 DR1: 0000000000000000 DR2: 0000000000000000
[ 1411.546383] DR3: 0000000000000000 DR6: 00000000fffe0ff0 DR7: 0000000000000400
[ 1411.546412] Stack:
[ 1411.546421] ffff881e49bbfc50 0000000000000002 ffff881f07b00628 ffff881e49bbfcb8
[ 1411.546456] 000000000000017b 000000000000000e 0000000000000000 ffffea00794f6600
[ 1411.546490] ffffea00794f6640 ffffea00794f6680 ffffea0001449a00 ffffea00014499c0
[ 1411.546524] Call Trace:
[ 1411.546545] [<ffffffffa070c9ab>] ext4_writepages+0x45b/0xd60 [ext4]
[ 1411.546576] [<ffffffff8118d93e>] do_writepages+0x1e/0x40
[ 1411.546601] [<ffffffff811824f5>] __filemap_fdatawrite_range+0x65/0x80
[ 1411.546629] [<ffffffff81182641>] filemap_write_and_wait_range+0x41/0x90
[ 1411.546664] [<ffffffffa0703bba>] ext4_sync_file+0xba/0x320 [ext4]
[ 1411.546692] [<ffffffff8123028d>] vfs_fsync_range+0x1d/0x30
[ 1411.546717] [<ffffffff811ba89e>] SyS_msync+0x1fe/0x250
[ 1411.546741] [<ffffffff816974c9>] system_call_fastpath+0x16/0x1b
[ 1411.546765] Code: ff ff ff e8 2e 7e a8 e0 8b 85 40 ff ff ff eb c2 48
8d bd 50 ff ff ff e8 1a 7e a8 e0 eb 8c 4c 89 f7 e8 a0 81 a7 e0 e9 d5 fe
ff ff <0f> 0b 0f 0b e8 62 d6 97 e0 66 90 0f 1f 44 00 00 55 48 89 e5 41
[ 1411.548075] RIP [<ffffffffa07083e5>] mpage_prepare_extent_to_map+0x2d5/0x2e0 [ext4]
[ 1411.549292] RSP <ffff881e49bbfc10>
---here vmcore-dmesg got cut off----

Thanks
								Honza

[1] https://www.spinics.net/lists/linux-xfs/msg10090.html
[2] https://www.spinics.net/lists/linux-ext4/msg54377.html

--
Jan Kara [off-list ref]
SUSE Labs, CR

--
To unsubscribe, send a message with 'unsubscribe linux-mm' in
the body to majordomo@kvack.org.  For more info on Linux MM,
see: http://www.linux-mm.org/ .
Don't email: <a href=mailto:"dont@kvack.org"> email@kvack.org </a>

Attachments

Keyboard shortcuts
hback out one level
jnext message in thread
kprevious message in thread
ldrill in
Escclose help / fold thread tree
?toggle this help