On Mon, Sep 18, 2017 at 07:52:32PM +0200, Andreas Gruenbacher wrote:

On Thu, Sep 14, 2017 at 11:15 PM, Theodore Ts'o [off-list ref] wrote:

quoted

On Thu, Sep 14, 2017 at 04:06:19PM +0200, Andreas Gruenbacher wrote:

quoted

From: Christoph Hellwig <hch@lst.de>

Here we go, after another round of xfstests.

The next question, since it touches vfs infrastructure, is which tree
this patch queue should be merged through.  Al?

Discussions with Darrick before he went on vacation/honeymoon was that
up until now changes to fs/iomap.c had been going through XFS, but
since these changes didn't affect XFS, and the rest of the patch
series touches ext4 and ext4 functionality, that he was OK with
running this patch series through the ext4 tree.

That sure works for me.

Me too.

(Back from vacation, weeding his way through 2400 emails...)

--D

Andreas
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-xfs" in
the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html