Thread (24 messages) 24 messages, 5 authors, 2017-08-30

Re: [PATCH] ext4: introduce per-inode DAX flag

From: Dave Chinner <david@fromorbit.com>
Date: 2017-08-25 23:34:01
Also in: linux-xfs

On Fri, Aug 25, 2017 at 08:40:32AM -0700, Christoph Hellwig wrote:
On Fri, Aug 25, 2017 at 11:14:45AM -0400, Theodore Ts'o wrote:
quoted
quoted
I don't know of anyone that actually uses the flag.  If someone did
that would probably run into problems like changing that changing it
on a file that's currently mmaped would crash an burn badly.
Crash and burn meaning the *kernel* will crash and burn?  Or will data
be damaged?

Given that, maybe XFS should withdraw support for the DAX and hope no
one is actually using it?
Nah, -o dax works very well.  It's just the flag instead of the -o dax
option or rather switching it on a mapped file will probably be very dangerous.
In what way is it dangerous, Christoph?

Changing to/form DAX is simply a case of syncing the data and then
invalidating the existing mappings and letting the new faults go
direct or through the page cache. The mapping invalidation
requirements are no different to what we need to do to punch a hole
in a mapped file...

Cheers,

Dave.
-- 
Dave Chinner
david@fromorbit.com
Keyboard shortcuts
hback out one level
jnext message in thread
kprevious message in thread
ldrill in
Escclose help / fold thread tree
?toggle this help