On Tue, Aug 15, 2017 at 8:01 PM, Vijay Chidambaram [off-list ref] wrote:

Hi Josef and Amir,

...

@Amir: Given that Josef's code is already in the kernel, do you think
changing CrashMonkey code would be useful? We are always happy to
provide something for upstream, but we want to be sure how much work
would be involved.

Simply put, people (myself included) are more likely to use CrashMonkey
if it uses upstream kernel and/or if it brings valuable functionality
to filesystem
testing, beyond what log-writes already does -
I am have not studies either tools yet to be able to determine if that
is the case.

Cheers,
Amir.