Re: [PATCH v2 1/2] fs, xfs: perform dax_device lookup at mount

[PATCH v2 0/2] fs, dax: lookup dax_device at mount time · Dan Williams <hidden> · 2017-08-28
[PATCH v2 1/2] fs, xfs: perform dax_device lookup at mount · Dan Williams <hidden> · 2017-08-28
Re: [PATCH v2 1/2] fs, xfs: perform dax_device lookup at mount · Jan Kara <jack@suse.cz> · 2017-08-28
Re: [PATCH v2 1/2] fs, xfs: perform dax_device lookup at mount · Darrick J. Wong <hidden> · 2017-08-28
Re: [PATCH v2 1/2] fs, xfs: perform dax_device lookup at mount · Christoph Hellwig <hch@lst.de> · 2017-08-29
Re: [PATCH v2 1/2] fs, xfs: perform dax_device lookup at mount · Dan Williams <hidden> · 2017-08-29
Re: [PATCH v2 1/2] fs, xfs: perform dax_device lookup at mount · Dan Williams <hidden> · 2017-08-29
Re: [PATCH v2 1/2] fs, xfs: perform dax_device lookup at mount · Christoph Hellwig <hch@lst.de> · 2017-08-29
[PATCH v2 2/2] ext2, ext4: use the super_block dax_device · Dan Williams <hidden> · 2017-08-28
Re: [PATCH v2 2/2] ext2, ext4: use the super_block dax_device · Jan Kara <jack@suse.cz> · 2017-08-28

From: Christoph Hellwig <hidden>
Date: 2017-08-29 21:36:37
Also in: linux-fsdevel, linux-xfs, nvdimm

On Tue, Aug 29, 2017 at 02:35:27PM -0700, Dan Williams wrote:

Actually, why not just do this directly in xfs_fs_mount()? I think I
can refactor this to not touch mount_bdev() and put all the details in
the per-fs mount/umount paths.

Yes, and just cache in in the fs specific superblock.

`h`	back out one level
`j`	next message in thread
`k`	previous message in thread
`l`	drill in
`Esc`	close help / fold thread tree
`?`	toggle this help