Thread (16 messages) 16 messages, 6 authors, 2017-01-16

Re: [RFC PATCH] ext4: increase the protection of drop nlink and ext4 inode destroy

From: Andreas Dilger <hidden>
Date: 2017-01-04 22:00:24
Also in: linux-fsdevel, lkml

On Jan 4, 2017, at 2:54 PM, Darrick J. Wong [off-list ref] wrote:
On Wed, Jan 04, 2017 at 04:29:33PM +0800, zhangyi (F) wrote:
quoted
On 2017/1/1 6:59, Valdis.Kletnieks@vt.edu said:
quoted
On Mon, 26 Dec 2016 20:34:17 +0800, yi zhang said:
quoted
Because of the disk and hardware issue, the ext4 filesystem have
many errors, the inode->i_nlink of ext4 becomes zero abnormally
but the dentry is still positive, it will cause memory corruption
after the following process:

1) Due to the inode->i_nlink is 0, this inode will be added into
the orhpan list,
quoted
+	if (WARN(inode->i_nlink == 0, "inode %lu nlink"
+		" is already 0", inode->i_ino))
Can we get the filesystem? Or at least the device major/minor? If a system
has multiple large ext4 filesystems, it would be helpful to know which
one is having the problem.
       if (WARN(inode->i_nlink == 0,
-               "inode %lu nlink is already 0", inode->i_ino))
+               "inode %lu nlink is already 0, dev=%u:%u",
+               inode->i_ino, MAJOR(inode->i_sb->s_dev), MINOR(inode->i_sb->s_dev)))
               return;

We can modify as above, it's enough to know which filesystem is having the
problem, what do you think?
Why not:

if (inode->i_nlink == 0) {
	ext4_warning_inode(inode, "nlink is already 0");
	return;
}
I like this better as well.

Cheers, Andreas




Attachments

Keyboard shortcuts
hback out one level
jnext message in thread
kprevious message in thread
ldrill in
Escclose help / fold thread tree
?toggle this help