Re: [PATCH 0/3 v2] ext4: Inode flags handling

[PATCH 0/3 v2] ext4: Inode flags handling · Jan Kara <jack@suse.cz> · 2016-10-06
[PATCH 2/3] ext4: Be more strict when verifying flags set via SETFLAGS ioctls · Jan Kara <jack@suse.cz> · 2016-10-06
Re: [PATCH 2/3] ext4: Be more strict when verifying flags set via SETFLAGS ioctls · Theodore Ts'o <tytso@mit.edu> · 2016-11-29
[PATCH 1/3] ext4: Add EXT4_JOURNAL_DATA_FL and EXT4_EXTENTS_FL to modifiable mask · Jan Kara <jack@suse.cz> · 2016-10-06
Re: [PATCH 1/3] ext4: Add EXT4_JOURNAL_DATA_FL and EXT4_EXTENTS_FL to modifiable mask · Theodore Ts'o <tytso@mit.edu> · 2016-11-29
[PATCH 3/3] ext4: Inode flags diet · Jan Kara <jack@suse.cz> · 2016-10-06
Re: [PATCH 3/3] ext4: Inode flags diet · Theodore Ts'o <tytso@mit.edu> · 2016-11-29
Re: [PATCH 0/3 v2] ext4: Inode flags handling · Jan Kara <jack@suse.cz> · 2016-11-23

From: Jan Kara <jack@suse.cz>
Date: 2016-11-23 09:55:38

On Thu 06-10-16 13:04:31, Jan Kara wrote:

Hello,

so these three patches implement what I had in mind when discussing ext4
inode flags handling. What do you guys think? I've verified chattr(1)
keeps working as expected, xfstests run has passed.

Changes since v1:
* fixed handling of EXTENTS and JOURNAL_DATA flags

Ping? Any opinion on these patches?

								Honza
-- 
Jan Kara [off-list ref]
SUSE Labs, CR

`h`	back out one level
`j`	next message in thread
`k`	previous message in thread
`l`	drill in
`Esc`	close help / fold thread tree
`?`	toggle this help