Re: [f2fs-dev] [PATCH] fscrypto: fix to null-terminate encrypted filename in fname_encrypt
From: Theodore Ts'o <tytso@mit.edu>
Date: 2016-08-29 19:08:14
Also in:
linux-f2fs-devel, lkml
From: Theodore Ts'o <tytso@mit.edu>
Date: 2016-08-29 19:08:14
Also in:
linux-f2fs-devel, lkml
On Mon, Aug 29, 2016 at 10:55:47PM +0800, Chao Yu wrote:
Hi Ted, Jaegeuk, Since encryption functionality in ext4/f2fs was exported to vfs as fscrypot module, more filesystems can use it, I'm not sure, maybe other fs will traverse encrypted filename directly. So, could we set this null character in fname_encrypt in advance in order to avoid hitting random characters behind target filename when traversing it?
The encrypted filename is only used by the file system; it's not anything which is visible outside of the file system --- if it does, such as passing it to the security subsystem, it's a bug. Secondly, remember that the encrypted filename is a binary blob, and may contain hex 00 as part of the encrypted filename. So ***any*** code that tries to use NULL termination for the encrypted filename by definition is a bug. In other words, you must use memcpy, and not strcpy. If you use strcpy, even if you did add a NUL character to the end of the encrypted filename (which is a bit of a misnomer because it is a binary blob, not an ASCII string, so NUL is really not technically correct), there will be encrypted filenames where strcpy will stop early, because there is a 0x00 byte in the encrypted filename. Hence, other file systems MUST NOT traverse the encrypted filename directly, because treating it as a NUL-terminated string when it is really a binary blob of bits that can include a 0x00 byte is by definition a BUG. Cheers, - Ted